Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BMSFX vs FSMDX
BMSFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts BMSFX vs FSMDX
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq A
Price$15.13
Change+$0.09 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.58
Change+$0.22 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
BMSFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BMSFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMSFX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. BMSFX (1.74B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than BMSFX: FSMDX (1.31) vs BMSFX (0.63). BMSFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: BMSFX (9 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). BMSFX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). BMSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BMSFX: FSMDX (0) vs BMSFX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.51 vs. BMSFX (2.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 74.34 vs. BMSFX (37.15).
| BMSFX | FSMDX | BMSFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.03 | 3,360% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.03 | 3,720% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.841 | 7.931 | 74% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 42.4B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.31 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.67 | 14.51 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.77 | 45.57 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.15 | 74.34 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 126.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement