Ad is loading...
BMTLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SXOOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BMTLF vs SXOOF

Header iconBMTLF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts BMTLF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
BeMetals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$15K
CapitalizationN/A
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$31.89K
CapitalizationN/A
BMTLF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMTLF vs. SXOOF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMTLF is a Hold and SXOOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BMTLF: $0.06 vs. SXOOF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: BMTLF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMTLF: 27% vs. SXOOF: 33%
Market capitalization -- BMTLF: $24.08M vs. SXOOF: $24.01M
BMTLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $24.08M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMTLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BMTLF is a better buy in the long-term than SXOOF.

Price Growth

BMTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMTLF($24.1M) and SXOOF($24M) have the same market capitalization . BMTLF YTD gains are higher at: -11.137 vs. SXOOF (-53.428). SXOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.5M vs. BMTLF (-14.43M). BMTLF has more cash in the bank: 4.64M vs. SXOOF (3.86M). BMTLF has less debt than SXOOF: BMTLF (6.98M) vs SXOOF (11.2M). BMTLF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMTLFSXOOFBMTLF / SXOOF
Capitalization24.1M24M100%
EBITDA-14.43M-9.5M152%
Gain YTD-11.137-53.42821%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.64M3.86M120%
Total Debt6.98M11.2M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCHI22.250.02
+0.09%
Schwab 5-10 Year Corp Bd ETF
MAGG20.270.01
+0.03%
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF
DFEV26.56-0.03
-0.11%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
UTWY44.35-0.07
-0.16%
US Treasury 20 Year Bond ETF
FUNL43.44-0.37
-0.84%
CornerCap Fundametrics® Lrg-Cap ETF FUNL

BMTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMTLF and NVSGF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMTLF and NVSGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMTLF
1D Price
Change %
BMTLF100%
-9.67%
NVSGF - BMTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PXCLF - BMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMTF - BMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+11.31%
SXOOF - BMTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-7.46%
EROSF - BMTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and NEXA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and NEXA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
-7.46%
NEXA - SXOOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
BMTLF - SXOOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.67%
SRLZF - SXOOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.75%
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More