BMTLF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
24.08M
SXOOF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
24.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BMTLF vs SXOOF

Header iconBMTLF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts BMTLF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
BeMetals
Price$0.02
Change-$0.01 (-33.33%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization24.08M
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$52.15K
Capitalization24.01M
BMTLF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BMTLF vs. SXOOF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BMTLF is a Hold and SXOOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BMTLF: $0.02 vs. SXOOF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: BMTLF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BMTLF: 14% vs. SXOOF: 94%
Market capitalization -- BMTLF: $24.08M vs. SXOOF: $24.01M
BMTLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $24.08M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $24.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BMTLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BMTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BMTLF and SXOOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BMTLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -31.01% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.84% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BMTLF($24.1M) and SXOOF($24M) have the same market capitalization . SXOOF YTD gains are higher at: 44.444 vs. BMTLF (-53.499). SXOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -9.5M vs. BMTLF (-14.43M). BMTLF has more cash in the bank: 4.64M vs. SXOOF (3.86M). BMTLF has less debt than SXOOF: BMTLF (6.98M) vs SXOOF (11.2M). BMTLF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
BMTLFSXOOFBMTLF / SXOOF
Capitalization24.1M24M100%
EBITDA-14.43M-9.5M152%
Gain YTD-53.49944.444-120%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.64M3.86M120%
Total Debt6.98M11.2M62%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
77
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRVL68.353.19
+4.90%
Marvell Technology
SNV49.061.46
+3.07%
Synovus Financial Corp
EUDA3.440.09
+2.69%
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
MBI4.440.04
+0.91%
MBIA
VERA22.70-7.93
-25.89%
Vera Therapeutics

BMTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BMTLF and PXCLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BMTLF and PXCLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BMTLF
1D Price
Change %
BMTLF100%
N/A
PXCLF - BMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMTF - BMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-10.13%
SXOOF - BMTLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.33%
BNNLF - BMTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRYGF - BMTLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and NEXA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and NEXA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
+8.33%
NEXA - SXOOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
BMTLF - SXOOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRLZF - SXOOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.52%
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More