BNC
Price
$7.85
Change
+$0.16 (+2.08%)
Updated
Sep 26, 12:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
331.31M
TGHLF
Price
$1.34
Change
+$0.02 (+1.52%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
186.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNC vs TGHLF

Header iconBNC vs TGHLF Comparison
Open Charts BNC vs TGHLFBanner chart's image
CEA Industries
Price$7.85
Change+$0.16 (+2.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization331.31M
Tornado Infrastructure Equipment
Price$1.34
Change+$0.02 (+1.52%)
Volume$998
Capitalization186.02M
BNC vs TGHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNC vs. TGHLF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNC is a Hold and TGHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BNC: $7.69 vs. TGHLF: $1.34)
Brand notoriety: BNC and TGHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNC: 112% vs. TGHLF: 9%
Market capitalization -- BNC: $331.31M vs. TGHLF: $186.02M
BNC [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $331.31M. TGHLF’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $186.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $217.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $15.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGHLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGHLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGHLF is a better buy in the long-term than BNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGHLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNC is a better buy in the short-term than TGHLF.

Price Growth

BNC (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -29.45% price change this week, while TGHLF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.42%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-2.06% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNC($331M) has a higher market cap than TGHLF($186M). TGHLF YTD gains are higher at: 75.859 vs. BNC (-5.296). TGHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17M vs. BNC (-3.31M). TGHLF has higher revenues than BNC: TGHLF (149M) vs BNC (3.28M).
BNCTGHLFBNC / TGHLF
Capitalization331M186M178%
EBITDA-3.31M17M-19%
Gain YTD-5.29675.859-7%
P/E RatioN/A24.33-
Revenue3.28M149M2%
Total CashN/A5.93M-
Total DebtN/A33.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNC vs TGHLF: Fundamental Ratings
BNC
TGHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
866
SMR RATING
1..100
9733
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9029

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGHLF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BNC (88). This means that TGHLF’s stock grew similarly to BNC’s over the last 12 months.

TGHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNC (86). This means that TGHLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BNC’s over the last 12 months.

TGHLF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNC (97). This means that TGHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNC’s over the last 12 months.

TGHLF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BNC (65). This means that TGHLF’s stock grew similarly to BNC’s over the last 12 months.

TGHLF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNC (100). This means that TGHLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCTGHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JCSCX21.54N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Small Cap Value C
GMYPX17.73N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value P
FWOMX18.30N/A
N/A
Fidelity Women's Leadership
JACDX10.63N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Environmental Opps R6
AZNAX11.60N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth A

BNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNC and CMCO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNC and CMCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNC
1D Price
Change %
BNC100%
-2.78%
CMCO - BNC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
UGRO - BNC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
VRRM - BNC
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
HYFM - BNC
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
NKLAQ - BNC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TGHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGHLF and TRATF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGHLF and TRATF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGHLF
1D Price
Change %
TGHLF100%
+0.91%
TRATF - TGHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EPIAF - TGHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
DTRUY - TGHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
BNC - TGHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
MAOIF - TGHLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More