BNCC
Price
$29.30
Change
-$0.44 (-1.48%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
84.4M
CMHF
Price
$27.70
Change
-$0.05 (-0.18%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCC vs CMHF

Header iconBNCC vs CMHF Comparison
Open Charts BNCC vs CMHFBanner chart's image
BNC
Price$29.30
Change-$0.44 (-1.48%)
Volume$417
Capitalization84.4M
Community Heritage Financial
Price$27.70
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
BNCC vs CMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCC vs. CMHF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCC is a Buy and CMHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCC: $29.30 vs. CMHF: $27.70)
Brand notoriety: BNCC and CMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCC: 72% vs. CMHF: 13%
Market capitalization -- BNCC: $84.4M vs. CMHF: $0
BNCC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $84.4M. CMHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the long-term than BNCC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMHF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CMHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CMHF is a better buy in the short-term than BNCC.

Price Growth

BNCC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.03% price change this week, while CMHF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNCC is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMHF YTD gains are higher at: 16.511 vs. BNCC (-8.723).
BNCCCMHFBNCC / CMHF
Capitalization84.4MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.72316.511-53%
P/E Ratio13.04N/A-
Revenue49.7MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt16.5MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCC vs CMHF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCC
CMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2130
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4447
SMR RATING
1..100
6561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6911
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCC (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to BNCC’s over the last 12 months.

BNCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CMHF (47) in the null industry. This means that BNCC’s stock grew similarly to CMHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCC (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to BNCC’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCC (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew similarly to BNCC’s over the last 12 months.

CMHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNCC (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCCCMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMEFF0.250.03
+12.70%
Laurion Mineral Exploration Inc.
ZIJMF2.750.07
+2.54%
Zijin Mining Group Company Ltd.
JEHLY27.92N/A
N/A
Johnson Electric Holdings Ltd.
ROWKF0.33N/A
N/A
Renoworks Software, Inc.
HLMMF38.80N/A
N/A
Holmen AB

BNCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNCC and GVFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNCC and GVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCC
1D Price
Change %
BNCC100%
N/A
GVFF - BNCC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
FIDS - BNCC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBKB - BNCC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
SLBK - BNCC
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.81%
CMHF - BNCC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMHF has been loosely correlated with CDAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMHF jumps, then CDAB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHF100%
N/A
CDAB - CMHF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWBK - CMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
KEY - CMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
BNCC - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WTBFA - CMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More