BNCZF
Price
$14.70
Change
+$2.95 (+25.11%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.59B
GPFOF
Price
$2.77
Change
+$0.15 (+5.70%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
15.99B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs GPFOF

Header iconBNCZF vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$14.70
Change+$2.95 (+25.11%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization22.59B
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.77
Change+$0.15 (+5.70%)
Volume$200
Capitalization15.99B
BNCZF vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. GPFOF commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and GPFOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $14.70 vs. GPFOF: $2.78)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 395% vs. GPFOF: 11%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $22.59B vs. GPFOF: $15.99B
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.59B. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $15.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNCZF and GPFOF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the short-term than BNCZF.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($22.6B) has a higher market cap than GPFOF($16B). GPFOF (8.09) and BNCZF (7.93) have similar P/E ratio . BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 80.147 vs. GPFOF (18.085). BNCZF has less debt than GPFOF: BNCZF (30.2B) vs GPFOF (51.5B). GPFOF has higher revenues than BNCZF: GPFOF (85.7B) vs BNCZF (7.02B).
BNCZFGPFOFBNCZF / GPFOF
Capitalization22.6B16B141%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD80.14718.085443%
P/E Ratio7.938.0998%
Revenue7.02B85.7B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.2B51.5B59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
131
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2746
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNCZF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (49). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (31). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCZF (8). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to BNCZF’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (48). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (46). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERX55.800.65
+1.18%
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF
VIG217.790.84
+0.39%
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
SEIV39.060.06
+0.17%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Fac ETF
BLDG25.800.02
+0.06%
Cambria Global Real Estate ETF
MYMG24.68N/A
+0.02%
SPDR SSGA My2027 Municipal Bond ETF

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.68%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.31%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.33%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
-7.55%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More