BNCZF
Price
$11.75
Change
-$0.51 (-4.16%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.94B
SOBS
Price
$27.65
Change
-$1.11 (-3.86%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
70.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs SOBS

Header iconBNCZF vs SOBS Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs SOBSBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$11.75
Change-$0.51 (-4.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization20.94B
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$27.65
Change-$1.11 (-3.86%)
Volume$361
Capitalization70.1M
BNCZF vs SOBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. SOBS commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and SOBS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $11.75 vs. SOBS: $27.65)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and SOBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 100% vs. SOBS: 46%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $20.94B vs. SOBS: $70.1M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.94B. SOBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $70.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSOBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SOBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than SOBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SOBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the short-term than SOBS.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($20.9B) has a higher market cap than SOBS($70.1M). SOBS has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: SOBS (15.45) vs BNCZF (6.35). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 43.995 vs. SOBS (9.536). BNCZF has higher revenues than SOBS: BNCZF (5.55B) vs SOBS (29.4M).
BNCZFSOBSBNCZF / SOBS
Capitalization20.9B70.1M29,815%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.9959.536461%
P/E Ratio6.3515.4541%
Revenue5.55B29.4M18,864%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt24BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF vs SOBS: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
SOBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
272
SMR RATING
1..100
875
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNCZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (26). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOBS (72). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's SMR Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOBS (75). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (58). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNCZF (52). This means that SOBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFSOBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
28%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSUMY27.450.18
+0.66%
Sumitomo Corp.
JUVF13.990.01
+0.07%
Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
PXGYF0.85N/A
N/A
Pax Global Technology Ltd
PCCWY6.61-0.87
-11.63%
PCCW Limited
AQIA0.10-0.03
-24.60%
Aquiva Group Inc.

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
More

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
-3.86%
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
More