BNCZF
Price
$9.50
Change
+$1.34 (+16.42%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
7.61B
SRNN
Price
$13.75
Change
-$0.15 (-1.08%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.6M
Ad is loading...

BNCZF vs SRNN

Header iconBNCZF vs SRNN Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs SRNNBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$9.50
Change+$1.34 (+16.42%)
Volume$150
Capitalization7.61B
Southern Banc Company, Inc. (The)
Price$13.75
Change-$0.15 (-1.08%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization10.6M
BNCZF vs SRNN Comparison Chart
Loading...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. SRNN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and SRNN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $9.50 vs. SRNN: $13.75)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and SRNN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 4% vs. SRNN: 188%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $7.61B vs. SRNN: $10.6M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.61B. SRNN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $10.6M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSRNN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • SRNN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than SRNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRNN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SRNN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +16.42% price change this week, while SRNN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRNN is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($7.61B) has a higher market cap than SRNN($10.6M). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 16.422 vs. SRNN (0.000).
BNCZFSRNNBNCZF / SRNN
Capitalization7.61B10.6M71,774%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.4220.000-
P/E Ratio6.48N/A-
Revenue5.15BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF vs SRNN: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
SRNN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
134
SMR RATING
1..100
763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1510
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRNN's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCZF (30). This means that SRNN’s stock grew similarly to BNCZF’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (34). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (63). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (45). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

SRNN's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as BNCZF (15). This means that SRNN’s stock grew similarly to BNCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFSRNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTGRX26.090.26
+1.01%
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock M
TCFSCV10.980.06
+0.55%
Thrivent Core Small Cap Value
SCWFX67.130.28
+0.42%
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
MSSYX9.860.04
+0.41%
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Z
FARCX14.92-0.02
-0.13%
Nuveen Real Estate Securities I

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

SRNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRNN has been loosely correlated with HLAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRNN jumps, then HLAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRNN
1D Price
Change %
SRNN100%
N/A
HLAN - SRNN
48%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FSUN - SRNN
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
BNCZF - SRNN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - SRNN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFCL - SRNN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More