BNCZF
Price
$11.75
Change
-$0.51 (-4.16%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
20.43B
SRNN
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
8.57M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs SRNN

Header iconBNCZF vs SRNN Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs SRNNBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$11.75
Change-$0.51 (-4.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization20.43B
Southern Banc Company, Inc. (The)
Price$11.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.57M
BNCZF vs SRNN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. SRNN commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Buy and SRNN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $11.75 vs. SRNN: $11.25)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and SRNN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 100% vs. SRNN: 26%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $20.43B vs. SRNN: $8.57M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $20.43B. SRNN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $8.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRNN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SRNN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than SRNN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNCZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRNN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNCZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SRNN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRNN is a better buy in the short-term than BNCZF.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRNN (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than SRNN($8.57M). SRNN has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: SRNN (9.38) vs BNCZF (6.39). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 43.995 vs. SRNN (-18.182). BNCZF has higher revenues than SRNN: BNCZF (7.02B) vs SRNN (9.1M).
BNCZFSRNNBNCZF / SRNN
Capitalization20.4B8.57M237,956%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD43.995-18.182-242%
P/E Ratio6.399.3868%
Revenue7.02B9.1M77,207%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt30.2BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF vs SRNN: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
SRNN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4147
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
6
Undervalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
245
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6555

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNCZF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (44). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRNN (45). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (100). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (60). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

BNCZF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRNN (100). This means that BNCZF’s stock grew similarly to SRNN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNCZFSRNN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRNN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FJP65.000.60
+0.92%
First Trust Japan AlphaDEX® ETF
MGK388.642.18
+0.56%
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
CGGE30.060.14
+0.48%
Capital Group Global Equity ETF
GABF49.110.02
+0.04%
Gabelli Financial Services Opp ETF
REZ84.08-0.12
-0.14%
iShares Residential & Multisector RE ETF

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
More

SRNN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRNN and FSUN have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRNN and FSUN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRNN
1D Price
Change %
SRNN100%
N/A
FSUN - SRNN
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
BNCZF - SRNN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBKL - SRNN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WFCL - SRNN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERKH - SRNN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More