BNCZF
Price
$9.00
Change
+$0.14 (+1.58%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
7.61B
TCBX
Price
$30.58
Change
-$0.73 (-2.33%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
272.41M
49 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNCZF vs TCBX

Header iconBNCZF vs TCBX Comparison
Open Charts BNCZF vs TCBXBanner chart's image
Banco BPM Societa Per Azioni
Price$9.00
Change+$0.14 (+1.58%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.61B
Third Coast Bancshares
Price$30.58
Change-$0.73 (-2.33%)
Volume$935
Capitalization272.41M
BNCZF vs TCBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
TCBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNCZF vs. TCBX commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNCZF is a Hold and TCBX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BNCZF: $9.00 vs. TCBX: $30.60)
Brand notoriety: BNCZF and TCBX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNCZF: 8% vs. TCBX: 59%
Market capitalization -- BNCZF: $7.61B vs. TCBX: $272.41M
BNCZF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $7.61B. TCBX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $272.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNCZF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTCBX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNCZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TCBX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNCZF is a better buy in the long-term than TCBX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TCBX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TCBX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BNCZF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCBX (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

TCBX is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.37% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNCZF($7.61B) has a higher market cap than TCBX($272M). TCBX has higher P/E ratio than BNCZF: TCBX (9.70) vs BNCZF (6.48). BNCZF YTD gains are higher at: 10.294 vs. TCBX (-7.791). TCBX has less debt than BNCZF: TCBX (142M) vs BNCZF (20.7B). BNCZF has higher revenues than TCBX: BNCZF (5.15B) vs TCBX (147M).
BNCZFTCBXBNCZF / TCBX
Capitalization7.61B272M2,797%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.294-7.791-132%
P/E Ratio6.489.7067%
Revenue5.15B147M3,503%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20.7B142M14,577%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNCZF: Fundamental Ratings
BNCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2
SMR RATING
1..100
6
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
TCBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TCBX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAIMX21.93N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value A
FTXNX42.36N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Gr Inv
SQBFX13.70N/A
N/A
X-Square Balanced Fund, LLC A
TRGOX83.26N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr Inv
FTMCX24.26N/A
N/A
First Trust Multi-Strategy Cl C

BNCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNCZF has been loosely correlated with GPFOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNCZF jumps, then GPFOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNCZF
1D Price
Change %
BNCZF100%
N/A
GPFOF - BNCZF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UWHR - BNCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HFBA - BNCZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
TCBX - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
FSUN - BNCZF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
More

TCBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCBX has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TCBX jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCBX
1D Price
Change %
TCBX100%
+1.94%
SHBI - TCBX
73%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
BFST - TCBX
73%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
EGBN - TCBX
73%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
HBNC - TCBX
72%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
GBCI - TCBX
72%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
More