Ad is loading...
BND vs CCIF
BND vs CCIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BND vs. CCIF commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BND is a Hold and CCIF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BND has more net assets: 355B vs. CCIF (102M). BND has a higher annual dividend yield than CCIF: BND (2.394) vs CCIF (-10.496). BND was incepted earlier than CCIF: BND (18 years) vs CCIF (13 years). BND (0.03) has a lower expense ratio than CCIF (2.50). BND has a higher turnover CCIF (17.69) vs CCIF (17.69).
| BND | CCIF | BND / CCIF | |
| Gain YTD | 2.394 | -10.496 | -23% |
| Net Assets | 355B | 102M | 348,039% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.50 | 1% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 17.69 | 204% |
| Yield | 3.68 | 16.53 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BND | CCIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 47% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...