BNDSF
Price
$3.35
Change
+$0.18 (+5.66%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.7B
CBAUF
Price
$121.50
Change
-$0.29 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
118.93B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNDSF vs CBAUF

Header iconBNDSF vs CBAUF Comparison
Open Charts BNDSF vs CBAUFBanner chart's image
Banco De Sabadell SA
Price$3.35
Change+$0.18 (+5.66%)
Volume$5.62K
Capitalization6.7B
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
Price$121.50
Change-$0.29 (-0.24%)
Volume$3.1K
Capitalization118.93B
BNDSF vs CBAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNDSF vs. CBAUF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNDSF is a StrongBuy and CBAUF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BNDSF: $3.36 vs. CBAUF: $121.50)
Brand notoriety: BNDSF and CBAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNDSF: 165% vs. CBAUF: 635%
Market capitalization -- BNDSF: $6.7B vs. CBAUF: $118.93B
BNDSF [@Major Banks] is valued at $6.7B. CBAUF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $118.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNDSF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCBAUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BNDSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CBAUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSF is a better buy in the long-term than CBAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBAUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CBAUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BNDSF and CBAUF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BNDSF (@Major Banks) experienced а +3.55% price change this week, while CBAUF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.46%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.53% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBAUF($119B) has a higher market cap than BNDSF($6.7B). CBAUF has higher P/E ratio than BNDSF: CBAUF (18.15) vs BNDSF (6.30). BNDSF YTD gains are higher at: 72.051 vs. CBAUF (27.774). BNDSF has less debt than CBAUF: BNDSF (26.3B) vs CBAUF (161B). CBAUF has higher revenues than BNDSF: CBAUF (25.8B) vs BNDSF (5.94B).
BNDSFCBAUFBNDSF / CBAUF
Capitalization6.7B119B6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD72.05127.774259%
P/E Ratio6.3018.1535%
Revenue5.94B25.8B23%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt26.3B161B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNDSF vs CBAUF: Fundamental Ratings
BNDSF
CBAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3385
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4216
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNDSF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBAUF (99). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CBAUF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CBAUF (6). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to CBAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAUF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (7). This means that CBAUF’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CBAUF (40). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to CBAUF’s over the last 12 months.

CBAUF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (42). This means that CBAUF’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNDSFCBAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CANE11.020.42
+3.98%
Teucrium Sugar Fund
GLOV55.120.45
+0.82%
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
HYDW47.100.02
+0.04%
Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF
DXJS36.56N/A
N/A
WisdomTree Japan Opportunities ETF
HSBH65.24-0.12
-0.18%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC ADRHEDGED HSBH

BNDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNDSF and BNDSY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNDSF and BNDSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNDSF
1D Price
Change %
BNDSF100%
N/A
BNDSY - BNDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
CMWAY - BNDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CICHY - BNDSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
CICHF - BNDSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+16.84%
HBCYF - BNDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.80%
More

CBAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBAUF and CMWAY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBAUF and CMWAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBAUF
1D Price
Change %
CBAUF100%
N/A
CMWAY - CBAUF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
CICHY - CBAUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
BNDSF - CBAUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANDF - CBAUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANDY - CBAUF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More