BNDSF
Price
$3.90
Change
-$0.07 (-1.76%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
20.08B
CICHF
Price
$0.96
Change
-$0.01 (-1.03%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
264.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNDSF vs CICHF

Header iconBNDSF vs CICHF Comparison
Open Charts BNDSF vs CICHFBanner chart's image
Banco De Sabadell SA
Price$3.90
Change-$0.07 (-1.76%)
Volume$1.02K
Capitalization20.08B
China Construction Bank
Price$0.96
Change-$0.01 (-1.03%)
Volume$1.92K
Capitalization264.95B
BNDSF vs CICHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNDSF vs. CICHF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNDSF is a Hold and CICHF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BNDSF: $3.90 vs. CICHF: $0.96)
Brand notoriety: BNDSF and CICHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNDSF: 48% vs. CICHF: 2%
Market capitalization -- BNDSF: $20.08B vs. CICHF: $264.95B
BNDSF [@Major Banks] is valued at $20.08B. CICHF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $264.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $810.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $132.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNDSF’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCICHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNDSF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CICHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSF is a better buy in the long-term than CICHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNDSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CICHF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNDSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CICHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CICHF is a better buy in the short-term than BNDSF.

Price Growth

BNDSF (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.76% price change this week, while CICHF (@Major Banks) price change was -0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.14% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CICHF($265B) has a higher market cap than BNDSF($20.1B). BNDSF has higher P/E ratio than CICHF: BNDSF (9.28) vs CICHF (5.33). BNDSF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. CICHF (11.628). BNDSF has less debt than CICHF: BNDSF (29.9B) vs CICHF (3.36T). CICHF has higher revenues than BNDSF: CICHF (739B) vs BNDSF (6.51B).
BNDSFCICHFBNDSF / CICHF
Capitalization20.1B265B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD100.00011.628860%
P/E Ratio9.285.33174%
Revenue6.51B739B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt29.9B3.36T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNDSF vs CICHF: Fundamental Ratings
BNDSF
CICHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8737
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
363
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNDSF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CICHF (80). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CICHF (63). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

CICHF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSF (7). This means that CICHF’s stock grew similarly to BNDSF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (48). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CICHF (19). This means that BNDSF’s stock grew similarly to CICHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNDSFCICHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNDSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CICHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JAAA50.77N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF
LIAU227.34N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
MPRO30.21-0.09
-0.30%
Monarch ProCap ETF
IETC96.71-0.37
-0.38%
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Fcs ETF
AFSM32.07-0.26
-0.79%
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF

BNDSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNDSF and BNDSY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNDSF and BNDSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNDSF
1D Price
Change %
BNDSF100%
-0.06%
BNDSY - BNDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWAY - BNDSF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
CICHY - BNDSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
CICHF - BNDSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
HBCYF - BNDSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More

CICHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CICHF and CICHY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CICHF and CICHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CICHF
1D Price
Change %
CICHF100%
-1.03%
CICHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
BACHY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.61%
IDCBY - CICHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
ACGBY - CICHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
HBCYF - CICHF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
More