BNDSY
Price
$7.25
Change
+$0.25 (+3.57%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
18.86B
47 days until earnings call
FANDF
Price
$4.21
Change
-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNDSY vs FANDF

Header iconBNDSY vs FANDF Comparison
Open Charts BNDSY vs FANDFBanner chart's image
Banco De Sabadell SA
Price$7.25
Change+$0.25 (+3.57%)
Volume$778
Capitalization18.86B
Firstrand
Price$4.21
Change-$0.02 (-0.47%)
Volume$146
Capitalization22.76B
BNDSY vs FANDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNDSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNDSY vs. FANDF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNDSY is a Hold and FANDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BNDSY: $7.25 vs. FANDF: $4.22)
Brand notoriety: BNDSY and FANDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNDSY: 33% vs. FANDF: 18%
Market capitalization -- BNDSY: $18.86B vs. FANDF: $22.76B
BNDSY [@Major Banks] is valued at $18.86B. FANDF’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $22.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $809.47B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $131.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNDSY’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFANDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNDSY’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FANDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSY is a better buy in the long-term than FANDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNDSY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANDF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNDSY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FANDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNDSY is a better buy in the short-term than FANDF.

Price Growth

BNDSY (@Major Banks) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while FANDF (@Major Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +128.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNDSY is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.01% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANDF($22.8B) has a higher market cap than BNDSY($18.9B). FANDF has higher P/E ratio than BNDSY: FANDF (10.50) vs BNDSY (8.67). BNDSY YTD gains are higher at: 101.429 vs. FANDF (5.375). FANDF has higher revenues than BNDSY: FANDF (143B) vs BNDSY (6.51B).
BNDSYFANDFBNDSY / FANDF
Capitalization18.9B22.8B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD101.4295.3751,887%
P/E Ratio8.6710.5083%
Revenue6.51B143B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A21.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNDSY vs FANDF: Fundamental Ratings
BNDSY
FANDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
336
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4157
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1778
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNDSY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FANDF (87). This means that BNDSY’s stock grew significantly faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (36). This means that BNDSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

FANDF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BNDSY (7). This means that FANDF’s stock grew similarly to BNDSY’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FANDF (57). This means that BNDSY’s stock grew similarly to FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

BNDSY's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FANDF (78). This means that BNDSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FANDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNDSYFANDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNDSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FANDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GNOM37.990.91
+2.44%
Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF
VYM139.550.26
+0.19%
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
SLNZ46.900.07
+0.14%
TCW Senior Loan ETF
AAPU29.17-0.05
-0.17%
Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X Shares
OIH255.13-2.71
-1.05%
VanEck Oil Services ETF

BNDSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNDSY and SMFG have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNDSY and SMFG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNDSY
1D Price
Change %
BNDSY100%
+3.57%
SMFG - BNDSY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
BCS - BNDSY
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
AAVMY - BNDSY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
MUFG - BNDSY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
ING - BNDSY
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
More

FANDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FANDF and NAUBF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FANDF and NAUBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANDF
1D Price
Change %
FANDF100%
N/A
NAUBF - FANDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.52%
CMWAY - FANDF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
CICHY - FANDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
HBCYF - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
BNDSY - FANDF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.57%
More