BNED
Price
$9.22
Change
+$0.10 (+1.10%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
313.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MUSA
Price
$384.94
Change
+$6.57 (+1.74%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.21B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNED vs MUSA

Header iconBNED vs MUSA Comparison
Open Charts BNED vs MUSABanner chart's image
Barnes & Noble Education
Price$9.22
Change+$0.10 (+1.10%)
Volume$804.02K
Capitalization313.98M
Murphy USA
Price$384.94
Change+$6.57 (+1.74%)
Volume$152.41K
Capitalization7.21B
BNED vs MUSA Comparison Chart in %
BNED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUSA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNED vs. MUSA commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNED is a StrongBuy and MUSA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BNED: $9.22 vs. MUSA: $384.94)
Brand notoriety: BNED and MUSA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNED: 230% vs. MUSA: 51%
Market capitalization -- BNED: $313.98M vs. MUSA: $7.21B
BNED [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $313.98M. MUSA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $7.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $49.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $3.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMUSA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MUSA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MUSA is a better buy in the long-term than BNED.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNED’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUSA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNED’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MUSA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNED is a better buy in the short-term than MUSA.

Price Growth

BNED (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +38.44% price change this week, while MUSA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +24.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

MUSA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+24.19% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUSA($7.21B) has a higher market cap than BNED($314M). BNED YTD gains are higher at: -8.167 vs. MUSA (-22.869). MUSA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 996M vs. BNED (-2.09M). BNED has less debt than MUSA: BNED (364M) vs MUSA (2.59B). MUSA has higher revenues than BNED: MUSA (19.5B) vs BNED (1.57B).
BNEDMUSABNED / MUSA
Capitalization314M7.21B4%
EBITDA-2.09M996M-0%
Gain YTD-8.167-22.86936%
P/E RatioN/A16.32-
Revenue1.57B19.5B8%
Total Cash9.19MN/A-
Total Debt364M2.59B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNED vs MUSA: Fundamental Ratings
BNED
MUSA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9616
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9416
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNED's Valuation (42) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as MUSA (71). This means that BNED’s stock grew similarly to MUSA’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNED (100). This means that MUSA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNED’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's SMR Rating (16) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for BNED (94). This means that MUSA’s stock grew significantly faster than BNED’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BNED (61). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to BNED’s over the last 12 months.

MUSA's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BNED (90). This means that MUSA’s stock grew similarly to BNED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNEDMUSA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MUSA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ATGN0.580.02
+3.39%
Altigen Communications, Inc.
AXAHY45.020.53
+1.19%
AXA
SEUSF0.36N/A
+1.06%
Sintana Energy, Inc.
DVDCF6.30N/A
N/A
DAVIDE CAMPARI MILANO N V
LKHLY18.05N/A
N/A
Lonking Holdings, Ltd.

BNED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNED has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNED jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNED
1D Price
Change %
BNED100%
+1.10%
HNST - BNED
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
CPRT - BNED
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
BBWI - BNED
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
ONEW - BNED
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.56%
AAP - BNED
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
More

MUSA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUSA has been loosely correlated with CASY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MUSA jumps, then CASY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUSA
1D Price
Change %
MUSA100%
+1.74%
CASY - MUSA
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
ORLY - MUSA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
AZO - MUSA
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
CARS - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SAH - MUSA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More