BNGO
Price
$3.77
Change
-$0.08 (-2.08%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
17.65M
HSCS
Price
$3.41
Change
+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
7.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNGO vs HSCS

Header iconBNGO vs HSCS Comparison
Open Charts BNGO vs HSCSBanner chart's image
Bionano Genomics
Price$3.77
Change-$0.08 (-2.08%)
Volume$84.41K
Capitalization17.65M
HeartSciences
Price$3.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.29%)
Volume$7.67K
Capitalization7.65M
BNGO vs HSCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNGO vs. HSCS commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNGO is a StrongBuy and HSCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BNGO: $3.77 vs. HSCS: $3.41)
Brand notoriety: BNGO and HSCS are both not notable
BNGO represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while HSCS is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNGO: 71% vs. HSCS: 6%
Market capitalization -- BNGO: $17.65M vs. HSCS: $7.65M
BNGO [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $17.65M. HSCS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $7.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $169.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $230.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.98B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNGO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHSCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNGO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HSCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNGO is a better buy in the long-term than HSCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNGO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HSCS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNGO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HSCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNGO is a better buy in the short-term than HSCS.

Price Growth

BNGO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -5.75% price change this week, while HSCS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -6.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.47%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.93% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.77% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNGO($17.6M) has a higher market cap than HSCS($7.65M). HSCS has higher P/E ratio than BNGO: HSCS (0.55) vs BNGO (0.03). HSCS YTD gains are higher at: -10.733 vs. BNGO (-78.213). HSCS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -8.05M vs. BNGO (-60.99M). BNGO has more cash in the bank: 16.4M vs. HSCS (2.6M). HSCS has less debt than BNGO: HSCS (2.99M) vs BNGO (19.6M). BNGO has higher revenues than HSCS: BNGO (27.4M) vs HSCS (0).
BNGOHSCSBNGO / HSCS
Capitalization17.6M7.65M230%
EBITDA-60.99M-8.05M758%
Gain YTD-78.213-10.733729%
P/E Ratio0.030.555%
Revenue27.4M0-
Total Cash16.4M2.6M631%
Total Debt19.6M2.99M656%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNGO: Fundamental Ratings
BNGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNGOHSCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HSCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FICO1521.6415.27
+1.01%
Fair Isaac Corp
GBDC14.920.14
+0.95%
Golub Capital BDC
SYBX1.45N/A
N/A
Synlogic
PLBY1.64-0.03
-1.80%
Playboy Inc
KMTS16.14-1.57
-8.87%
Kestra Medical Technologies, Ltd.

HSCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSCS and HSDT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSCS and HSDT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSCS
1D Price
Change %
HSCS100%
+0.29%
HSDT - HSCS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
PSNL - HSCS
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.30%
MBOT - HSCS
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.75%
STAA - HSCS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
BNGO - HSCS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More