BNGO
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:17 AM (EDT)
INBS
Price
$1.49
Change
+$0.02 (+1.36%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:06 AM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

BNGO vs INBS

Header iconBNGO vs INBS Comparison
Open Charts BNGO vs INBSBanner chart's image
Bionano Genomics
Price$0.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Intelligent Bio Solutions
Price$1.49
Change+$0.02 (+1.36%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BNGO vs INBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BNGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
INBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BNGO vs. INBS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNGO is a Sell and INBS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BNGO: $0.33 vs. INBS: $1.47)
Brand notoriety: BNGO and INBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNGO: 87% vs. INBS: 3%
Market capitalization -- BNGO: $57.43M vs. INBS: $11.55M
BNGO [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $57.43M. INBS’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $11.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $7.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNGO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNGO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNGO is a better buy in the long-term than INBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNGO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNGO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNGO is a better buy in the short-term than INBS.

Price Growth

BNGO (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -11.92% price change this week, while INBS (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNGO is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2023.

INBS is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-2.01% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNGO($57.4M) has a higher market cap than INBS($11.5M). INBS YTD gains are higher at: -63.747 vs. BNGO (-82.751). INBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -12.05M vs. BNGO (-213.4M). BNGO has more cash in the bank: 102M vs. INBS (1.12M). INBS has less debt than BNGO: INBS (1.08M) vs BNGO (79.4M). BNGO has higher revenues than INBS: BNGO (36.1M) vs INBS (2.46M).
BNGOINBSBNGO / INBS
Capitalization57.4M11.5M499%
EBITDA-213.4M-12.05M1,771%
Gain YTD-82.751-63.747130%
P/E RatioN/A0.06-
Revenue36.1M2.46M1,467%
Total Cash102M1.12M9,115%
Total Debt79.4M1.08M7,345%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNGO: Fundamental Ratings
BNGO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNGOINBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BNGO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
INBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BNGO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNGO has been loosely correlated with WRBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNGO jumps, then WRBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNGO
1D Price
Change %
BNGO100%
-2.16%
WRBY - BNGO
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
CRL - BNGO
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
TWST - BNGO
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
MASS - BNGO
43%
Loosely correlated
-2.83%
CERS - BNGO
43%
Loosely correlated
-9.44%
More

INBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INBS has been loosely correlated with IINN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INBS jumps, then IINN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBS
1D Price
Change %
INBS100%
-1.34%
IINN - INBS
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WILLF - INBS
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
NMTC - INBS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PRPO - INBS
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
BNGO - INBS
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More