BNMDF
Price
$18.35
Change
+$6.85 (+59.57%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.13B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
INBC
Price
$11.70
Change
+$0.40 (+3.54%)
Updated
Nov 10 closing price
Capitalization
139.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNMDF vs INBC

Header iconBNMDF vs INBC Comparison
Open Charts BNMDF vs INBCBanner chart's image
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$18.35
Change+$6.85 (+59.57%)
Volume$128
Capitalization16.13B
InBankshares
Price$11.70
Change+$0.40 (+3.54%)
Volume$574
Capitalization139.04M
BNMDF vs INBC Comparison Chart in %
BNMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNMDF vs. INBC commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNMDF is a Hold and INBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BNMDF: $18.35 vs. INBC: $11.70)
Brand notoriety: BNMDF and INBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNMDF: 40% vs. INBC: 31%
Market capitalization -- BNMDF: $15.78B vs. INBC: $139.04M
BNMDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $15.78B. INBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $139.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNMDF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileINBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNMDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNMDF is a better buy in the long-term than INBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNMDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNMDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • INBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BNMDF is a better buy in the short-term than INBC.

Price Growth

BNMDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while INBC (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNMDF($16.1B) has a higher market cap than INBC($139M). INBC has higher P/E ratio than BNMDF: INBC (18.87) vs BNMDF (10.06). BNMDF YTD gains are higher at: 59.565 vs. INBC (32.353). INBC has less debt than BNMDF: INBC (102M) vs BNMDF (393M). BNMDF has higher revenues than INBC: BNMDF (2.45B) vs INBC (52.4M).
BNMDFINBCBNMDF / INBC
Capitalization16.1B139M11,583%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.56532.353184%
P/E Ratio10.0618.8753%
Revenue2.45B52.4M4,674%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt393M102M385%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNMDF vs INBC: Fundamental Ratings
BNMDF
INBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1747
SMR RATING
1..100
1266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BNMDF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as INBC (75). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew similarly to INBC’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as INBC (47). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew similarly to INBC’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INBC (66). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than INBC’s over the last 12 months.

BNMDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as INBC (48). This means that BNMDF’s stock grew similarly to INBC’s over the last 12 months.

INBC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BNMDF (26). This means that INBC’s stock grew similarly to BNMDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNMDFINBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNMDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
INBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DOG24.650.28
+1.15%
ProShares Short Dow30
FSCC28.440.15
+0.54%
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF
DBND46.410.04
+0.10%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF
MCH28.81-0.12
-0.42%
Matthews China Active ETF
PDI17.58-0.13
-0.73%
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund

BNMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNMDF and EXSR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNMDF and EXSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNMDF
1D Price
Change %
BNMDF100%
N/A
EXSR - BNMDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - BNMDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
KBCSY - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
GVYB - BNMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANDC - BNMDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
N/A
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CNBB - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MVLY - INBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More