BNMDF
Price
$18.35
Change
+$6.85 (+59.57%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
14.49B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
INBC
Price
$11.90
Change
+$0.30 (+2.59%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
141.39M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNMDF vs INBC

Header iconBNMDF vs INBC Comparison
Open Charts BNMDF vs INBCBanner chart's image
Banca Mediolanum SPA
Price$18.35
Change+$6.85 (+59.57%)
Volume$128
Capitalization14.49B
InBankshares
Price$11.90
Change+$0.30 (+2.59%)
Volume$700
Capitalization141.39M
BNMDF vs INBC Comparison Chart in %
BNMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNMDF vs. INBC commentary
Oct 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNMDF is a Hold and INBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BNMDF: $18.35 vs. INBC: $11.90)
Brand notoriety: BNMDF and INBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNMDF: 29% vs. INBC: 39%
Market capitalization -- BNMDF: $14.49B vs. INBC: $141.39M
BNMDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $14.49B. INBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $141.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNMDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNMDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNMDF is a better buy in the long-term than INBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNMDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNMDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • INBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INBC is a better buy in the short-term than BNMDF.

Price Growth

BNMDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +59.57% price change this week, while INBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNMDF($14.5B) has a higher market cap than INBC($141M). INBC has higher P/E ratio than BNMDF: INBC (19.19) vs BNMDF (10.29). BNMDF YTD gains are higher at: 59.565 vs. INBC (34.615). INBC has less debt than BNMDF: INBC (37.5M) vs BNMDF (393M). BNMDF has higher revenues than INBC: BNMDF (2.45B) vs INBC (52.4M).
BNMDFINBCBNMDF / INBC
Capitalization14.5B141M10,284%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD59.56534.615172%
P/E Ratio10.2919.1954%
Revenue2.45B52.4M4,674%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt393M37.5M1,048%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNMDF: Fundamental Ratings
BNMDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
22

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNMDFINBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNMDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFFC65.650.58
+0.89%
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
VGM10.130.04
+0.40%
Invesco Trust Investment Grade Municipals
UAE19.980.06
+0.30%
iShares MSCI UAE ETF
FPE18.40N/A
N/A
First Trust Preferred Sec & Inc ETF
MCDS57.54N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Md Cor ETF

BNMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNMDF and EXSR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNMDF and EXSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNMDF
1D Price
Change %
BNMDF100%
N/A
EXSR - BNMDF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DSBX - BNMDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
KBCSY - BNMDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
GVYB - BNMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANDC - BNMDF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
+2.59%
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
CNBB - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.71%
MVLY - INBC
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
BNMDF - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More