Ad is loading...
BNPQF
Price
$64.30
Change
+$1.95 (+3.13%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
SCGLY
Price
$5.56
Change
+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BNPQF vs SCGLY

Header iconBNPQF vs SCGLY Comparison
Open Charts BNPQF vs SCGLYBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$64.30
Change+$1.95 (+3.13%)
Volume$1.93K
CapitalizationN/A
Societe Generale
Price$5.56
Change+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Volume$549.22K
CapitalizationN/A
BNPQF vs SCGLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQF vs. SCGLY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQF is a Hold and SCGLY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BNPQF: $64.30 vs. SCGLY: $5.56)
Brand notoriety: BNPQF and SCGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQF: 3% vs. SCGLY: 124%
Market capitalization -- BNPQF: $78.9B vs. SCGLY: $22.18B
BNPQF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $78.9B. SCGLY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLY is a better buy in the long-term than BNPQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SCGLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SCGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BNPQF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while SCGLY (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGLY is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQF($78.9B) has a higher market cap than SCGLY($22.2B). SCGLY has higher P/E ratio than BNPQF: SCGLY (15.11) vs BNPQF (8.33). SCGLY YTD gains are higher at: 7.015 vs. BNPQF (-7.874). SCGLY has less debt than BNPQF: SCGLY (154B) vs BNPQF (341B). BNPQF has higher revenues than SCGLY: BNPQF (60.4B) vs SCGLY (38.6B).
BNPQFSCGLYBNPQF / SCGLY
Capitalization78.9B22.2B355%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.8747.015-112%
P/E Ratio8.3315.1155%
Revenue60.4B38.6B156%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt341B154B221%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQF vs SCGLY: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQF
SCGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6876
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9085
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (8). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (76). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SCGLY (5). This means that BNPQF’s stock grew similarly to SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (60). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQF (90). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to BNPQF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZDIIX27.06-0.08
-0.29%
Zacks Dividend Institutional
MPSIX25.68-0.28
-1.08%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index Inst
GCSCX23.27-0.33
-1.40%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts C
JACNX31.35-0.64
-2.00%
Janus Henderson Contrarian D
CMCMX7.59-0.17
-2.19%
Conestoga Discovery Investors

BNPQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQF has been loosely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQF jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQF
1D Price
Change %
BNPQF100%
+3.13%
BNPQY - BNPQF
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
SCGLY - BNPQF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
CRARY - BNPQF
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
KBCSY - BNPQF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
UNCRY - BNPQF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
More

SCGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLY has been closely correlated with BNPQY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCGLY jumps, then BNPQY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLY
1D Price
Change %
SCGLY100%
+0.91%
BNPQY - SCGLY
72%
Closely correlated
+1.73%
ISNPY - SCGLY
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
CRARY - SCGLY
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
KBCSY - SCGLY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
UNCRY - SCGLY
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.05%
More