BNPQY
Price
$45.01
Change
+$0.05 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
100.12B
58 days until earnings call
FSGB
Price
$9.43
Change
+$0.23 (+2.50%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
9.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNPQY vs FSGB

Header iconBNPQY vs FSGB Comparison
Open Charts BNPQY vs FSGBBanner chart's image
BNP Paribas
Price$45.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
Volume$592.97K
Capitalization100.12B
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.43
Change+$0.23 (+2.50%)
Volume$400
Capitalization9.55M
BNPQY vs FSGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNPQY vs. FSGB commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNPQY is a StrongBuy and FSGB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (BNPQY: $45.01 vs. FSGB: $9.43)
Brand notoriety: BNPQY and FSGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNPQY: 238% vs. FSGB: 142%
Market capitalization -- BNPQY: $100.12B vs. FSGB: $9.55M
BNPQY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $100.12B. FSGB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNPQY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNPQY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNPQY is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNPQY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSGB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNPQY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSGB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSGB is a better buy in the short-term than BNPQY.

Price Growth

BNPQY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.22% price change this week, while FSGB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BNPQY is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BNPQY($100B) has a higher market cap than FSGB($9.55M). FSGB has higher P/E ratio than BNPQY: FSGB (12.08) vs BNPQY (8.20). BNPQY YTD gains are higher at: 66.549 vs. FSGB (-1.823).
BNPQYFSGBBNPQY / FSGB
Capitalization100B9.55M1,047,669%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD66.549-1.823-3,651%
P/E Ratio8.2012.0868%
Revenue67BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt402BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNPQY vs FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
BNPQY
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7436
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
3100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3795
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSGB's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BNPQY (63). This means that FSGB’s stock grew similarly to BNPQY’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew significantly faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew significantly faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (59). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

BNPQY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (95). This means that BNPQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNPQYFSGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNPQY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENLV1.050.01
+0.96%
Enlivex Therapeutics Ltd
ALKS28.970.04
+0.14%
Alkermes plc
TDAC10.34N/A
+0.05%
Translational Development Acquisition Corp.
TMP70.14-0.11
-0.16%
Tompkins Financial Corp
TEL206.50-1.54
-0.74%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd

BNPQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BNPQY has been loosely correlated with CRARY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BNPQY jumps, then CRARY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNPQY
1D Price
Change %
BNPQY100%
+0.11%
CRARY - BNPQY
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
ISNPY - BNPQY
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
SCGLY - BNPQY
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
NRDBY - BNPQY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
UNCRY - BNPQY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
More

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with AOZOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then AOZOY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
AOZOY - FSGB
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNPQY - FSGB
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.11%
VWFB - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
ANDC - FSGB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More