BNTGF
Price
$57.73
Change
-$0.62 (-1.06%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
8.71B
SQM
Price
$44.47
Change
+$0.75 (+1.72%)
Updated
Sep 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.7B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNTGF vs SQM

Header iconBNTGF vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts BNTGF vs SQMBanner chart's image
Brenntag SE
Price$57.73
Change-$0.62 (-1.06%)
Volume$612
Capitalization8.71B
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$44.47
Change+$0.75 (+1.72%)
Volume$8.35K
Capitalization12.7B
BNTGF vs SQM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNTGF vs. SQM commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNTGF is a Hold and SQM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BNTGF: $57.73 vs. SQM: $43.72)
Brand notoriety: BNTGF and SQM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNTGF: 4% vs. SQM: 81%
Market capitalization -- BNTGF: $8.71B vs. SQM: $12.7B
BNTGF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $8.71B. SQM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $12.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $222.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNTGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BNTGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BNTGF is a better buy in the long-term than SQM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNTGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BNTGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SQM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SQM is a better buy in the short-term than BNTGF.

Price Growth

BNTGF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -6.26% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

SQM is expected to report earnings on Nov 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.64% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQM($12.7B) has a higher market cap than BNTGF($8.71B). SQM has higher P/E ratio than BNTGF: SQM (26.60) vs BNTGF (16.64). SQM YTD gains are higher at: 20.242 vs. BNTGF (-2.823). BNTGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.3B vs. SQM (937M). SQM has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. BNTGF (532M). BNTGF has less debt than SQM: BNTGF (552M) vs SQM (4.74B). BNTGF has higher revenues than SQM: BNTGF (16B) vs SQM (4.23B).
BNTGFSQMBNTGF / SQM
Capitalization8.71B12.7B69%
EBITDA1.3B937M139%
Gain YTD-2.82320.242-14%
P/E Ratio16.6426.6063%
Revenue16B4.23B378%
Total Cash532M2.23B24%
Total Debt552M4.74B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BNTGF vs SQM: Fundamental Ratings
BNTGF
SQM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9668
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
7073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SQM's Valuation (81) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as BNTGF (83) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to BNTGF’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as BNTGF (100) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to BNTGF’s over the last 12 months.

BNTGF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SQM (73) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BNTGF (85) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BNTGF’s over the last 12 months.

BNTGF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SQM (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that BNTGF’s stock grew significantly faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNTGFSQM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNTGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBAB34.844.94
+16.54%
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
REW6.040.06
+1.07%
ProShares UltraShort Technology
DOCT43.060.02
+0.05%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct
AOM47.42-0.09
-0.19%
iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allc ETF
FXA65.17-0.18
-0.27%
Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust

BNTGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNTGF and RPM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNTGF and RPM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNTGF
1D Price
Change %
BNTGF100%
-1.07%
RPM - BNTGF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
SCL - BNTGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
SQM - BNTGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
AHKSY - BNTGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
ALB - BNTGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More