BNXAF
Price
$0.93
Change
-$0.01 (-1.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
42.76M
CXGEF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
46.81M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BNXAF vs CXGEF

Header iconBNXAF vs CXGEF Comparison
Open Charts BNXAF vs CXGEFBanner chart's image
Banxa Holdings
Price$0.93
Change-$0.01 (-1.06%)
Volume$200
Capitalization42.76M
Computer & Technologies Holdings
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.44K
Capitalization46.81M
BNXAF vs CXGEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BNXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BNXAF vs. CXGEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BNXAF is a Hold and CXGEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BNXAF: $0.93 vs. CXGEF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: BNXAF and CXGEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BNXAF: 3% vs. CXGEF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BNXAF: $42.76M vs. CXGEF: $46.81M
BNXAF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $42.76M. CXGEF’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $46.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $271.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BNXAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXGEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BNXAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CXGEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BNXAF and CXGEF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BNXAF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BNXAF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BNXAF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а +25.21% price change this week, while CXGEF (@Information Technology Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+2.81% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXGEF($46.8M) has a higher market cap than BNXAF($42.8M). BNXAF YTD gains are higher at: 39.116 vs. CXGEF (-17.727).
BNXAFCXGEFBNXAF / CXGEF
Capitalization42.8M46.8M91%
EBITDA-3.07MN/A-
Gain YTD39.116-17.727-221%
P/E RatioN/A11.86-
Revenue399MN/A-
Total Cash2.86MN/A-
Total Debt14.9MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BNXAFCXGEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BNXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMCUF203.5018.10
+9.76%
Pro Medicus, Ltd.
CTUY44.99N/A
N/A
Century Next Financial Corp
HUTCY1.44N/A
N/A
Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong Holdings Ltd.
SVKEF18.65N/A
N/A
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB
SEAV0.02N/A
N/A
SEATECH VENTURES CORP.

BNXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BNXAF and CXGEF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BNXAF and CXGEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BNXAF
1D Price
Change %
BNXAF100%
-0.32%
CXGEF - BNXAF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WPLCF - BNXAF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
NABL - BNXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
NGRRF - BNXAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PCPJ - BNXAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CXGEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXGEF and ATEAY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXGEF and ATEAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXGEF
1D Price
Change %
CXGEF100%
N/A
ATEAY - CXGEF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBM - CXGEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
ITFRF - CXGEF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNXAF - CXGEF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
NURAF - CXGEF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
More