BOH
Price
$82.73
Change
-$0.25 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FULT
Price
$24.11
Change
-$0.38 (-1.55%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.61B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOH vs FULT

BOH vs FULT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOH vs. FULT commentary
Jul 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOH is a Buy and FULT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BOH: $82.73 vs. FULT: $24.02)
Brand notoriety: BOH and FULT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOH: 69% vs. FULT: 221%
Market capitalization -- BOH: $3.28B vs. FULT: $4.61B
BOH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.28B. FULT’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FULT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than BOH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FULT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOH is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

BOH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.16% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

BOH is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FULT($4.61B) has a higher market cap than BOH($3.28B). BOH has higher P/E ratio than FULT: BOH (15.96) vs FULT (11.52). FULT YTD gains are higher at: 26.427 vs. BOH (23.205). FULT has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. BOH (272M). BOH has less debt than FULT: BOH (649M) vs FULT (1.25B). FULT has higher revenues than BOH: FULT (1.33B) vs BOH (735M).
BOHFULTBOH / FULT
Capitalization3.28B4.61B71%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.20526.42788%
P/E Ratio15.9611.52139%
Revenue735M1.33B55%
Total Cash272M312M87%
Total Debt649M1.25B52%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOH vs FULT: Fundamental Ratings
BOH
FULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8438
SMR RATING
1..100
3423
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6743
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (56). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOH (84). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (34). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (45). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BOH (67). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to BOH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOHFULT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FULT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DESK42.750.74
+1.76%
VanEck Office and Commercial REIT ETF
BME43.650.62
+1.44%
Blackrock Health Sciences Trust
SPTI28.290.03
+0.11%
State Street SPDR Port Itmt Term Trs ETF
SCDS76.08N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Sm Cor ETF
OVLH41.66-0.05
-0.11%
Overlay Shares Hedged Lrg Cp Eq ETF

BOH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOH has been closely correlated with FHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOH jumps, then FHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOH
1D Price
Change %
BOH100%
-0.30%
FHB - BOH
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
FULT - BOH
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
STBA - BOH
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
UBSI - BOH
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
ASB - BOH
81%
Closely correlated
-1.86%
More