FULT's Logo
Stock
NASDAQ
FULT
Price
$14.59
Change
+$0.14 (+0.97%)
Updated
Jul 1, 6:59 PM EST
HWC's Logo
Stock
NASDAQ
HWC
Price
$45.12
Change
+$0.79 (+1.78%)
Updated
Jul 1, 6:59 PM EST
Header icon

FULT vs HWC Comparison

Open Charts FULT vs HWCBanner chart's image
AI

View a ticker or compare two or three

FULT vs HWC. Compare Fundamental and Technical Ratings

VS
FULT vs HWC Comparison Chart

Loading...

VS
FULT vs. HWC commentary
Jul 02, 2022
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FULT is a Buy and HWC is a Sell.
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 02, 2022
Stock price -- (FULT: $14.59 vs. HWC: $45.12)
Brand notoriety: FULT and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FULT: 165% vs. HWC: 72%
Market capitalization -- FULT: $2.35B vs. HWC: $3.9B
FULT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.35B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $158.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $4.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FULT is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the short-term than FULT.

Price Growth

FULT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.41% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was 0.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was 0.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

FULT is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2022.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FULT with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HWC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($3.9B) has a higher market cap than FULT($2.35B). FULT has higher P/E ratio than HWC: FULT (9.29) vs HWC (8.34). HWC YTD gains are higher at: -8.872 vs. FULT (-12.524). FULT has less debt than HWC: FULT (1.01B) vs HWC (1.98B). HWC has higher revenues than FULT: HWC (1.29B) vs FULT (928M).
FULTHWCFULT / HWC
Capitalization2.35B3.9B60%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.524-8.872141%
P/E Ratio9.298.34111%
Revenue928M1.29B72%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.01B1.98B51%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS

FULT vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings

FULT
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
3026
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3886
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FULT's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (65). This means that FULT’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (100). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (30). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (70). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.

FULT's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (86). This means that FULT’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULTHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
AI

View a ticker or compare two or three

Interesting Tickers

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGB3.250.06
+1.88%
First Trust Specialty Finance and Financial Opportunities Fund
CWB64.790.32
+0.50%
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
KALL25.630.01
+0.04%
KraneShares MSCI All China ETF
PIE18.49-0.33
-1.73%
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Mom ETF
PSI92.29-5.30
-5.43%
Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF