BOMXF
Price
$2.08
Change
-$0.02 (-0.95%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
CIIHY
Price
$34.07
Change
-$2.95 (-7.97%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
58.41B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOMXF vs CIIHY

Header iconBOMXF vs CIIHY Comparison
Open Charts BOMXF vs CIIHYBanner chart's image
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V
Price$2.08
Change-$0.02 (-0.95%)
Volume$1.01M
Capitalization1.16B
Citic Securities
Price$34.07
Change-$2.95 (-7.97%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization58.41B
BOMXF vs CIIHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOMXF vs. CIIHY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOMXF is a Hold and CIIHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BOMXF: $2.08 vs. CIIHY: $34.07)
Brand notoriety: BOMXF and CIIHY are both not notable
BOMXF represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while CIIHY is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOMXF: 907% vs. CIIHY: 66%
Market capitalization -- BOMXF: $1.16B vs. CIIHY: $58.41B
BOMXF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $1.16B. CIIHY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $58.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $148.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOMXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCIIHY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BOMXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CIIHY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the long-term than BOMXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOMXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CIIHY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOMXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CIIHY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIIHY is a better buy in the short-term than BOMXF.

Price Growth

BOMXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +0.48% price change this week, while CIIHY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +65.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-1.02% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-1.05% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIIHY($58.4B) has a higher market cap than BOMXF($1.16B). CIIHY has higher P/E ratio than BOMXF: CIIHY (15.05) vs BOMXF (12.52). BOMXF YTD gains are higher at: 29.193 vs. CIIHY (26.425). BOMXF has less debt than CIIHY: BOMXF (423M) vs CIIHY (218B). CIIHY has higher revenues than BOMXF: CIIHY (69.2B) vs BOMXF (4.18B).
BOMXFCIIHYBOMXF / CIIHY
Capitalization1.16B58.4B2%
EBITDA2.99BN/A-
Gain YTD29.19326.425110%
P/E Ratio12.5215.0583%
Revenue4.18B69.2B6%
Total Cash3.42BN/A-
Total Debt423M218B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOMXF vs CIIHY: Fundamental Ratings
BOMXF
CIIHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1689
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
3833
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4711
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CIIHY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOMXF (90). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOMXF (100). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (38). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BOMXF (53). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew similarly to BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

CIIHY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BOMXF (47). This means that CIIHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BOMXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOMXFCIIHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOMXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CIIHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFWM5.80N/A
N/A
First Foundation
CSBR6.39-0.06
-0.93%
Champions Oncology
AEG7.90-0.15
-1.86%
Aegon Ltd
WAI3.16-0.11
-3.36%
Top KingWin Ltd.
CELC51.94-2.04
-3.78%
Celcuity

BOMXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOMXF and JEF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOMXF and JEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOMXF
1D Price
Change %
BOMXF100%
N/A
JEF - BOMXF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.17%
XP - BOMXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
RJF - BOMXF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
EVR - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
SCHW - BOMXF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
More

CIIHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CIIHY and FUTU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CIIHY and FUTU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIIHY
1D Price
Change %
CIIHY100%
N/A
FUTU - CIIHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
TIGR - CIIHY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
DMGGF - CIIHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
BOMXF - CIIHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMSQF - CIIHY
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.63%
More