Ad is loading...
BOPAX vs VFFSX
BOPAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts BOPAX vs VFFSX
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
Price$21.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.05M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$264.55
Change+$2.09 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32T
BOPAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOPAX vs. VFFSX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOPAX is a Buy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.32T vs. BOPAX (351M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than BOPAX: VFFSX (1.36) vs BOPAX (0.00). BOPAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: BOPAX (22 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). BOPAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). BOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.19 vs. VFFSX (2.00). BOPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: BOPAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.74 vs. BOPAX (-11.93). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 92.84 vs. BOPAX (9.52).
| BOPAX | VFFSX | BOPAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 11,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 11,100% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.467 | -8.776 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 1.32T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.93 | 4.74 | -252% |
| Returns for 3 years | -25.76 | 22.23 | -116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.52 | 92.84 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...