Ad is loading...
BOPAX vs VFFSX
BOPAX vs VFFSX Comparison
Open Charts BOPAX vs VFFSX
Sterling Capital Special Opps A
Price$23.30
Change+$0.26 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.52M
Vanguard 500 Index Institutional Select
Price$277.30
Change+$1.59 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33T
BOPAX vs VFFSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOPAX vs. VFFSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOPAX is a StrongBuy and VFFSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFFSX has more cash in the bank: 1.34T vs. BOPAX (364M). VFFSX pays higher dividends than BOPAX: VFFSX (1.37) vs BOPAX (0.00). BOPAX was incepted earlier than VFFSX: BOPAX (22 years) vs VFFSX (9 years). BOPAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than VFFSX (0.01). BOPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.19 vs. VFFSX (2.00). BOPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFFSX: BOPAX (1000) vs VFFSX (5000000000). VFFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. BOPAX (-8.97). VFFSX return over 5 years is better than : 92.26 vs. BOPAX (7.56).
| BOPAX | VFFSX | BOPAX / VFFSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 11,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.01 | 11,100% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.645 | -4.171 | 159% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 1.34T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.97 | 8.61 | -104% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.01 | 41.23 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.56 | 92.26 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers