It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BORR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BORR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BORR (@Contract Drilling) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while HP (@Contract Drilling) price change was -6.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Contract Drilling industry was -3.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.00%.
BORR is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2025.
HP is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
The contract drilling industry includes companies that provide onshore and offshore drilling services to the energy sector. Services are delivered on a contractual or per-fee basis. Customers of this industry include major and independent oil and gas companies. Strong oil demand could potentially boost contract fees. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Transocean Ltd and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. are among the major drilling companies in the U.S.
BORR | HP | BORR / HP | |
Capitalization | 1.61B | 4.16B | 39% |
EBITDA | 332M | 986M | 34% |
Gain YTD | -41.081 | -3.030 | 1,356% |
P/E Ratio | 67.67 | 10.08 | 671% |
Revenue | 772M | 2.83B | 27% |
Total Cash | 102M | 298M | 34% |
Total Debt | 1.7B | 545M | 312% |
BORR | HP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 83 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 7 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BORR's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HP (21) in the Contract Drilling industry. This means that BORR’s stock grew similarly to HP’s over the last 12 months.
HP's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as BORR (100) in the null industry. This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to BORR’s over the last 12 months.
HP's SMR Rating (61) in the Contract Drilling industry is in the same range as BORR (75) in the null industry. This means that HP’s stock grew similarly to BORR’s over the last 12 months.
HP's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Contract Drilling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BORR (91) in the null industry. This means that HP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BORR’s over the last 12 months.
HP's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Contract Drilling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BORR (100) in the null industry. This means that HP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BORR’s over the last 12 months.
BORR | HP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 3 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 8 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago78% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BORR has been loosely correlated with RIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BORR jumps, then RIG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BORR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BORR | 100% | +4.02% | ||
RIG - BORR | 62% Loosely correlated | +5.19% | ||
NE - BORR | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
PDS - BORR | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
NBR - BORR | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
HP - BORR | 52% Loosely correlated | -6.24% | ||
More |