Ad is loading...
BOTZ vs TOKE
BOTZ vs TOKE Comparison
Open Charts BOTZ vs TOKE
Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF
Price$26.60
Change+$0.09 (+0.34%)
Volume$1.8K
Net Assets2.17B
Cambria Cannabis ETF
Price$4.29
Change+$0.07 (+1.66%)
Volume$222
Net Assets10.83M
BOTZ vs TOKE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOTZ vs. TOKE commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOTZ is a Buy and TOKE is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOTZ has more net assets: 2.17B vs. TOKE (10.8M). BOTZ (-17.027) and TOKE (-17.865) have matching annual dividend yield . BOTZ was incepted earlier than TOKE: BOTZ (9 years) vs TOKE (6 years). TOKE (0.43) has a lower expense ratio than BOTZ (0.68). TOKE has a higher turnover BOTZ (10.43) vs BOTZ (10.43).
| BOTZ | TOKE | BOTZ / TOKE | |
| Gain YTD | -17.027 | -17.865 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 10.8M | 20,120% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.43 | 158% |
| Turnover | 10.43 | 13.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.15 | 6.13 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BOTZ | TOKE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BOTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOTZ has been loosely correlated with ATS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOTZ jumps, then ATS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTZ | 100% | -2.18% | ||
| ATS - BOTZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.43% | ||
| CGNX - BOTZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| AI - BOTZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| DT - BOTZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| ISRG - BOTZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
TOKE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOKE has been loosely correlated with HITI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TOKE jumps, then HITI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOKE | 100% | +1.51% | ||
| HITI - TOKE | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| IIPR - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
| SAM - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| GNLN - TOKE | 15% Poorly correlated | -13.20% | ||
| MO - TOKE | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
More | ||||