Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BOUT vs IMCG
BOUT vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts BOUT vs IMCG
Innovator IBD® Breakout Opps ETF
Price$35.88
Change+$0.29 (+0.81%)
Volume$12.91K
Net Assets12.49M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$78.73
Change+$0.59 (+0.76%)
Volume$93.98K
Net Assets2.7B
BOUT vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOUT vs. IMCG commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOUT is a Buy and IMCG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.7B vs. BOUT (12.5M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than BOUT: IMCG (4.411) vs BOUT (-8.164). BOUT was incepted earlier than IMCG: BOUT (7 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than BOUT (0.85). BOUT has a higher turnover IMCG (43.00) vs IMCG (43.00).
| BOUT | IMCG | BOUT / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | -8.164 | 4.411 | -185% |
| Net Assets | 12.5M | 2.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.06 | 1,417% |
| Turnover | 1448.00 | 43.00 | 3,367% |
| Yield | 0.66 | 0.75 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| IMCG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BOUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOUT has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOUT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOUT | 100% | +0.82% | ||
| AROC - BOUT | 69% Closely correlated | +2.96% | ||
| MFC - BOUT | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| KMI - BOUT | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| PCOR - BOUT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| BHF - BOUT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 82% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
More | ||||