Ad is loading...
BOUT vs IMCG
BOUT vs IMCG Comparison
Open Charts BOUT vs IMCG
Innovator IBD® Breakout Opps ETF
Price$32.66
Change+$0.15 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.48K
Net Assets11.39M
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Price$66.95
Change-$2.25 (-3.25%)
Volume$252.47K
Net Assets2.39B
BOUT vs IMCG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BOUT vs. IMCG commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOUT is a Buy and IMCG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IMCG has more net assets: 2.39B vs. BOUT (11.4M). IMCG has a higher annual dividend yield than BOUT: IMCG (-11.212) vs BOUT (-16.414). BOUT was incepted earlier than IMCG: BOUT (7 years) vs IMCG (21 years). IMCG (0.06) has a lower expense ratio than BOUT (0.85).
| BOUT | IMCG | BOUT / IMCG | |
| Gain YTD | -16.414 | -11.212 | 146% |
| Net Assets | 11.4M | 2.39B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.06 | 1,417% |
| Turnover | N/A | 43.00 | - |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.81 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BOUT | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 86% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 85% | 10 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BOUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOUT has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BOUT jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOUT | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| AROC - BOUT | 68% Closely correlated | -5.02% | ||
| MFC - BOUT | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.31% | ||
| PCOR - BOUT | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.87% | ||
| KMI - BOUT | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| TRGP - BOUT | 56% Loosely correlated | -6.46% | ||
More | ||||
IMCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IMCG has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IMCG jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IMCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMCG | 100% | -3.25% | ||
| FTV - IMCG | 81% Closely correlated | -5.89% | ||
| ARES - IMCG | 80% Closely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| JEF - IMCG | 79% Closely correlated | -9.89% | ||
| HLT - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | -3.99% | ||
| OWL - IMCG | 76% Closely correlated | -5.55% | ||
More | ||||