BOWFF
Price
$50.98
Change
-$0.23 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
CDPYF
Price
$30.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.78B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWFF vs CDPYF

Header iconBOWFF vs CDPYF Comparison
Open Charts BOWFF vs CDPYFBanner chart's image
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$50.98
Change-$0.23 (-0.45%)
Volume$6.15K
Capitalization2.73B
Canadian Apartment Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$30.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.2K
Capitalization4.78B
BOWFF vs CDPYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWFF vs. CDPYF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWFF is a Hold and CDPYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWFF: $50.98 vs. CDPYF: $30.28)
Brand notoriety: BOWFF and CDPYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWFF: 10% vs. CDPYF: 8%
Market capitalization -- BOWFF: $2.73B vs. CDPYF: $4.78B
BOWFF [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $2.73B. CDPYF’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.14B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCDPYF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CDPYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWFF is a better buy in the long-term than CDPYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOWFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDPYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BOWFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CDPYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BOWFF and CDPYF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BOWFF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while CDPYF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was -2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.48%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (-0.06% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDPYF($4.78B) has a higher market cap than BOWFF($2.73B). CDPYF has higher P/E ratio than BOWFF: CDPYF (82.29) vs BOWFF (11.55). BOWFF YTD gains are higher at: 14.340 vs. CDPYF (2.228). BOWFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 449M vs. CDPYF (379M). CDPYF has more cash in the bank: 129M vs. BOWFF (25.6M). BOWFF has less debt than CDPYF: BOWFF (3.29B) vs CDPYF (5.84B). CDPYF has higher revenues than BOWFF: CDPYF (1.09B) vs BOWFF (622M).
BOWFFCDPYFBOWFF / CDPYF
Capitalization2.73B4.78B57%
EBITDA449M379M118%
Gain YTD14.3402.228644%
P/E Ratio11.5582.2914%
Revenue622M1.09B57%
Total Cash25.6M129M20%
Total Debt3.29B5.84B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOWFF vs CDPYF: Fundamental Ratings
BOWFF
CDPYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
7888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5661
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
104
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDPYF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as BOWFF (24). This means that CDPYF’s stock grew similarly to BOWFF’s over the last 12 months.

BOWFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDPYF (100). This means that BOWFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

BOWFF's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (88). This means that BOWFF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

BOWFF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as CDPYF (61). This means that BOWFF’s stock grew similarly to CDPYF’s over the last 12 months.

CDPYF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BOWFF (10). This means that CDPYF’s stock grew similarly to BOWFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWFFCDPYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDPYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEURX31.040.12
+0.39%
Franklin Mutual International Value C
RIDBX26.58N/A
N/A
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
GLRBX23.63-0.08
-0.34%
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
RMBGX37.08-0.14
-0.38%
RMB I
ICEQX23.97-0.17
-0.70%
Macquarie Core Equity Fund Class R6

BOWFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWFF has been loosely correlated with CDPYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWFF jumps, then CDPYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWFF
1D Price
Change %
BOWFF100%
-0.45%
CDPYF - BOWFF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRRTF - BOWFF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
RIOCF - BOWFF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
DREUF - BOWFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
VRE - BOWFF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
More

CDPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDPYF has been loosely correlated with RIOCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDPYF jumps, then RIOCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDPYF
1D Price
Change %
CDPYF100%
N/A
RIOCF - CDPYF
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
SPG - CDPYF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.63%
IRT - CDPYF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
MAA - CDPYF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
MAC - CDPYF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More