BOWN
Price
$11.19
Change
+$0.45 (+4.19%)
Updated
May 22, 11:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
95.42M
BOWNU
Price
$12.87
Change
+$2.37 (+22.57%)
Updated
May 21, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWN vs BOWNU

Header iconBOWN vs BOWNU Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs BOWNUBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$11.19
Change+$0.45 (+4.19%)
Volume$200
Capitalization95.42M
Bowen Acquisition
Price$12.87
Change+$2.37 (+22.57%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BOWN vs BOWNU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. BOWNU commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and BOWNU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $10.74 vs. BOWNU: $10.50)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and BOWNU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 1% vs. BOWNU: 19%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. BOWNU: $0
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. BOWNU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBOWNU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BOWNU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWN is a better buy in the long-term than BOWNU.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -13.18% price change this week, while BOWNU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.02% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWN YTD gains are higher at: -1.648 vs. BOWNU (-4.632). BOWN (501K) and BOWNU (501K) have equal amount of cash in the bank .
BOWNBOWNUBOWN / BOWNU
Capitalization95.4MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.648-4.63236%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash501K501K100%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRMSX27.69N/A
N/A
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Svc
MPISX7.02N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Income Stock M
AWTAX20.71N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Water A
FSJHX78.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel M
PAHWX8.17N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps A

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWN has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWN jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
+0.37%
BOWNU - BOWN
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OAKU - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
ISRL - BOWN
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
HSPOU - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - BOWN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More