BOWN
Price
$3.78
Change
-$0.08 (-2.07%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
ESHA
Price
$10.99
Change
+$0.22 (+2.04%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
151.76M
Ad is loading...

BOWN vs ESHA

Header iconBOWN vs ESHA Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs ESHABanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$3.78
Change-$0.08 (-2.07%)
Volume$9.48K
Capitalization95.42M
ESH Acquisition
Price$10.99
Change+$0.22 (+2.04%)
Volume$178
Capitalization151.76M
BOWN vs ESHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. ESHA commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and ESHA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $3.78 vs. ESHA: $10.99)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and ESHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 14% vs. ESHA: 13%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. ESHA: $151.76M
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. ESHA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $151.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESHA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWN is a better buy in the long-term than ESHA.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +23.53% price change this week, while ESHA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ESHA($152M) has a higher market cap than BOWN($95.4M). ESHA YTD gains are higher at: 2.043 vs. BOWN (-65.385). ESHA has more cash in the bank: 1.97M vs. BOWN (501K).
BOWNESHABOWN / ESHA
Capitalization95.4M152M63%
EBITDAN/A-391.76K-
Gain YTD-65.3852.043-3,201%
P/E RatioN/A167.28-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash501K1.97M25%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMGFX67.28-0.62
-0.91%
ClearBridge International Growth FI
SUSLX14.83-0.24
-1.59%
Lazard US Sustainable Equity Open
VSFSX24.26-0.54
-2.18%
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value R6
PSMKX51.79-1.92
-3.57%
Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth K
LOMGX31.97-1.45
-4.34%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities F3

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BOWN has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BOWN jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
-1.95%
BOWNU - BOWN
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FTII - BOWN
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
ESHA - BOWN
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWUP - BOWN
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RENE - BOWN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ESHA has been loosely correlated with ASPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ESHA jumps, then ASPC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESHA
1D Price
Change %
ESHA100%
N/A
ASPC - ESHA
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
FGMC - ESHA
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
BOWN - ESHA
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
IPXXU - ESHA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNIX - ESHA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More