BOWN
Price
$10.10
Change
-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
95.42M
OAKU
Price
$11.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
80.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWN vs OAKU

Header iconBOWN vs OAKU Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs OAKUBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.98%)
Volume$546
Capitalization95.42M
Oak Woods Acquisition
Price$11.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$157
Capitalization80.8M
BOWN vs OAKU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. OAKU commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Hold and OAKU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWN: $10.10 vs. OAKU: $11.70)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and OAKU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 5% vs. OAKU: 5%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. OAKU: $80.8M
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. OAKU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $80.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOAKU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OAKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BOWN and OAKU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BOWN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BOWN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +16.16% price change this week, while OAKU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

OAKU is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWN($95.4M) has a higher market cap than OAKU($80.8M). OAKU YTD gains are higher at: 3.084 vs. BOWN (-7.509). OAKU has more cash in the bank: 527K vs. BOWN (501K).
BOWNOAKUBOWN / OAKU
Capitalization95.4M80.8M118%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.5093.084-244%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash501K527K95%
Total DebtN/A380K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BOWN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BOWN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMDUF80.95N/A
N/A
AMUNDI SA
HNFSA45.00N/A
N/A
Hanover Foods Corp.
NXCLF0.88N/A
N/A
Lifull Co Ltd
FRZCF1.75N/A
N/A
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
TGCB0.04N/A
N/A
Tego Cyber Inc.