Ad is loading...
BOWN
Price
$10.88
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
OAKU
Price
$11.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

BOWN vs OAKU

Header iconBOWN vs OAKU Comparison
Open Charts BOWN vs OAKUBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Oak Woods Acquisition
Price$11.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.02K
CapitalizationN/A
BOWN vs OAKU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWN vs. OAKU commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWN is a Sell and OAKU is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BOWN: $10.88 vs. OAKU: $11.35)
Brand notoriety: BOWN and OAKU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWN: 3% vs. OAKU: 7%
Market capitalization -- BOWN: $95.42M vs. OAKU: $80.8M
BOWN [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $95.42M. OAKU’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $80.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOAKU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • OAKU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, OAKU is a better buy in the long-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.23% price change this week, while OAKU (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.59% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWN($95.4M) has a higher market cap than OAKU($80.8M). OAKU YTD gains are higher at: 7.787 vs. BOWN (5.426). OAKU has more cash in the bank: 527K vs. BOWN (501K).
BOWNOAKUBOWN / OAKU
Capitalization95.4M80.8M118%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.4267.78770%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash501K527K95%
Total DebtN/A380K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OFAVX29.72-0.09
-0.30%
Olstein All Cap Value A
TSOHX13.38-0.07
-0.52%
Nuveen International Res Eq I
HSWYX17.85-0.16
-0.89%
Hartford Schroders International Stk Y
MGFAX10.27-0.22
-2.10%
MassMutual Global A
INSCX20.00-0.54
-2.63%
Catalyst Insider Buying C

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOWN and OAKU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOWN and OAKU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
+0.09%
OAKU - BOWN
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPAB - BOWN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - BOWN
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESHA - BOWN
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
KVAC - BOWN
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OAKU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OAKU has been loosely correlated with ALCYU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OAKU jumps, then ALCYU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OAKU
1D Price
Change %
OAKU100%
N/A
ALCYU - OAKU
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
HAIAU - OAKU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDSTU - OAKU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWNU - OAKU
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
THCPU - OAKU
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More