BOWNU
Price
$12.50
Change
-$0.52 (-3.99%)
Updated
May 30, 10:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
MLAC
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
43.29M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BOWNU vs MLAC

Header iconBOWNU vs MLAC Comparison
Open Charts BOWNU vs MLACBanner chart's image
Bowen Acquisition
Price$12.50
Change-$0.52 (-3.99%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Mountain Lake Acquisition
Price$10.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$14.76K
Capitalization43.29M
BOWNU vs MLAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BOWNU vs. MLAC commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BOWNU is a Buy and MLAC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BOWNU: $13.02 vs. MLAC: $10.25)
Brand notoriety: BOWNU and MLAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BOWNU: 36% vs. MLAC: 19%
Market capitalization -- BOWNU: $0 vs. MLAC: $43.29M
BOWNU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. MLAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $43.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BOWNU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BOWNU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWNU is a better buy in the long-term than MLAC.

Price Growth

BOWNU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWNU has more cash in the bank: 501K vs. MLAC (108K).
BOWNUMLACBOWNU / MLAC
CapitalizationN/A43.3M-
EBITDAN/A-1.84M-
Gain YTD18.256N/A-
P/E RatioN/A26.25-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash501K108K464%
Total DebtN/A3.38M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CABIX16.02N/A
N/A
AB Global Risk Allocation I
ACSLX90.76N/A
N/A
American Century Select C
ASLAX14.64N/A
N/A
AB Select US Long/Short A
BSMDX13.38N/A
N/A
BlackRock SMID-Cap Growth Equity Instl
CFWAX28.76-0.39
-1.34%
Calvert Global Water A

MLAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLAC has been loosely correlated with BOWNU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLAC jumps, then BOWNU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLAC
1D Price
Change %
MLAC100%
-0.05%
BOWNU - MLAC
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATMV - MLAC
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXAI - MLAC
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
LNZA - MLAC
23%
Poorly correlated
-9.27%
BEEP - MLAC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
More