BP
Price
$28.38
Change
-$2.96 (-9.44%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
105.62B
24 days until earnings call
PCCYF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.04 (-4.94%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
195.67B
Ad is loading...

BP vs PCCYF

Header iconBP vs PCCYF Comparison
Open Charts BP vs PCCYFBanner chart's image
BP
Price$28.38
Change-$2.96 (-9.44%)
Volume$23.09M
Capitalization105.62B
PetroChina
Price$0.77
Change-$0.04 (-4.94%)
Volume$17.89K
Capitalization195.67B
BP vs PCCYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BP vs. PCCYF commentary
Apr 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BP is a Hold and PCCYF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BP: $28.38 vs. PCCYF: $0.77)
Brand notoriety: BP: Notable vs. PCCYF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BP: 177% vs. PCCYF: 45%
Market capitalization -- BP: $105.62B vs. PCCYF: $195.67B
BP [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $105.62B. PCCYF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $195.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCCYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than BP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BP (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -16.18% price change this week, while PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -1.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -8.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

BP is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-8.47% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($196B) has a higher market cap than BP($106B). BP has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: BP (7.37) vs PCCYF (6.11). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BP (-2.643). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478B vs. BP (43.6B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. BP (28.6B). BP has less debt than PCCYF: BP (63.1B) vs PCCYF (451B). PCCYF has higher revenues than BP: PCCYF (3.19T) vs BP (210B).
BPPCCYFBP / PCCYF
Capitalization106B196B54%
EBITDA43.6B478B9%
Gain YTD-2.6430.000-
P/E Ratio7.376.11121%
Revenue210B3.19T7%
Total Cash28.6B306B9%
Total Debt63.1B451B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BP vs PCCYF: Fundamental Ratings
BP
PCCYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7933
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3634
SMR RATING
1..100
8461
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7470
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
157
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BP (99) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PCCYF’s stock grew significantly faster than BP’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as BP (36) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BP (84) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as BP (74) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to BP’s over the last 12 months.

BP's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCCYF (57) in the null industry. This means that BP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWD0.550.02
+3.34%
CaliberCos
XTKG1.11-0.01
-0.89%
X3 Holdings Co Ltd
BLKB62.20-1.45
-2.28%
Blackbaud
CRON1.71-0.07
-3.93%
Cronos Group
GOLD17.67-1.71
-8.82%
Barrick Gold Corp

BP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BP
1D Price
Change %
BP100%
-9.44%
SHEL - BP
74%
Closely correlated
-8.08%
CVX - BP
71%
Closely correlated
-8.22%
TTE - BP
71%
Closely correlated
-7.07%
CVE - BP
69%
Closely correlated
-12.72%
XOM - BP
69%
Closely correlated
-7.20%
More

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
-4.67%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.08%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.16%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-9.44%
More