Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPAVX vs RMFCX
BPAVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BPAVX vs RMFCX
Boston Partners All Cap Value I
Price$32.78
Change+$0.48 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.06
Change+$0.59 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.67B
BPAVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPAVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BPAVX (1.32B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BPAVX: RMFCX (1.26) vs BPAVX (0.61). BPAVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BPAVX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BPAVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BPAVX (24.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPAVX: RMFCX (250) vs BPAVX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.53 vs. BPAVX (2.93). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.07 vs. BPAVX (36.78).
| BPAVX | RMFCX | BPAVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.559 | 10.702 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.26 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 10.53 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.49 | 23.41 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.78 | 55.07 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.32 | 79.34 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement