Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPAVX vs RMFCX
BPAVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BPAVX vs RMFCX
Boston Partners All Cap Value I
Price$33.11
Change-$0.20 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.21
Change-$0.23 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.45B
BPAVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPAVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPAVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BPAVX (1.29B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BPAVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs BPAVX (0.60). BPAVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BPAVX (23 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BPAVX (1.10) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BPAVX (24.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPAVX: RMFCX (250) vs BPAVX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. BPAVX (-0.56). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.16 vs. BPAVX (41.87).
| BPAVX | RMFCX | BPAVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.91 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.91 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.922 | 10.979 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 1.24 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.56 | 5.35 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.64 | 31.20 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.87 | 55.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.22 | 94.76 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement