BPCGF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.02 (-2.67%)
Updated
May 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.14B
UNBK
Price
$55.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPCGF vs UNBK

Header iconBPCGF vs UNBK Comparison
Open Charts BPCGF vs UNBKBanner chart's image
Banco Comercial Portugues S.A
Price$0.73
Change-$0.02 (-2.67%)
Volume$2.15K
Capitalization4.14B
United National Bank (Cairo, GA)
Price$55.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BPCGF vs UNBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPCGF vs. UNBK commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPCGF is a Hold and UNBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BPCGF: $0.73 vs. UNBK: $55.00)
Brand notoriety: BPCGF and UNBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPCGF: 131% vs. UNBK: 61%
Market capitalization -- BPCGF: $4.14B vs. UNBK: $0
BPCGF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.14B. UNBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPCGF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPCGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UNBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBK is a better buy in the long-term than BPCGF.

Price Growth

BPCGF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UNBK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPCGF YTD gains are higher at: 65.814 vs. UNBK (14.065).
BPCGFUNBKBPCGF / UNBK
Capitalization4.14BN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD65.81414.065468%
P/E Ratio13.72N/A-
Revenue3.37BN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.54BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPCGF vs UNBK: Fundamental Ratings
BPCGF
UNBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9747
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
21
SMR RATING
1..100
642
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNBK's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPCGF (78). This means that UNBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPCGF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as BPCGF (2). This means that UNBK’s stock grew similarly to BPCGF’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBK (42). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBK (44). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew similarly to UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

BPCGF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBK (49). This means that BPCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIIRX15.62N/A
N/A
Putnam International Value R
CRARX10.45N/A
N/A
NYLI CBRE Real Estate Class I
VIHAX38.54N/A
N/A
Vanguard Intl Hi Div Yld Adm
SWMCX67.67N/A
N/A
Schwab ® US Mid-Cap Index
MDOAX10.84N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Developing Opportunity A

BPCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPCGF has been loosely correlated with MZTFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPCGF jumps, then MZTFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPCGF
1D Price
Change %
BPCGF100%
N/A
MZTFF - BPCGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UNBK - BPCGF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IBWC - BPCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HBIA - BPCGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIBRF - BPCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
More

UNBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNBK has been loosely correlated with BPCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNBK jumps, then BPCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBK
1D Price
Change %
UNBK100%
N/A
BPCGF - UNBK
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KPCPF - UNBK
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TYFG - UNBK
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNKB - UNBK
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITZ - UNBK
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More