BPIRF
Price
$5.55
Change
-$0.63 (-10.19%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
CMTDF
Price
$27.18
Change
+$0.58 (+2.18%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
13.45B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPIRF vs CMTDF

Header iconBPIRF vs CMTDF Comparison
Open Charts BPIRF vs CMTDFBanner chart's image
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A
Price$5.55
Change-$0.63 (-10.19%)
Volume$143
Capitalization4.83B
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$27.18
Change+$0.58 (+2.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization13.45B
BPIRF vs CMTDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPIRF vs. CMTDF commentary
Jun 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRF is a Hold and CMTDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BPIRF: $5.55 vs. CMTDF: $27.18)
Brand notoriety: BPIRF and CMTDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPIRF: 109% vs. CMTDF: 82%
Market capitalization -- BPIRF: $4.83B vs. CMTDF: $13.45B
BPIRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.83B. CMTDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPIRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMTDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BPIRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMTDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPIRF is a better buy in the long-term than CMTDF.

Price Growth

BPIRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMTDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.02% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMTDF($13.5B) has a higher market cap than BPIRF($4.83B). CMTDF has higher P/E ratio than BPIRF: CMTDF (10.76) vs BPIRF (6.85). BPIRF YTD gains are higher at: 41.401 vs. CMTDF (23.821). CMTDF has higher revenues than BPIRF: CMTDF (1.14T) vs BPIRF (2.17B).
BPIRFCMTDFBPIRF / CMTDF
Capitalization4.83B13.5B36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD41.40123.821174%
P/E Ratio6.8510.7664%
Revenue2.17B1.14T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.78BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPIRF vs CMTDF: Fundamental Ratings
BPIRF
CMTDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4346
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPIRF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CMTDF (52). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to CMTDF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPIRF (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (43). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

CMTDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (100). This means that CMTDF’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CUSEX35.730.20
+0.56%
Capital Group US Equity
PLVJX18.48N/A
N/A
Principal Large Cap Value III J
LYRIX27.67N/A
N/A
Lyrical US Value Equity Institutional
FHEQX13.26N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes SDG Engagement Eq A
FCFMX19.24N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Total Market Index

BPIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPIRF has been loosely correlated with PONT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPIRF jumps, then PONT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPIRF
1D Price
Change %
BPIRF100%
N/A
PONT - BPIRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JTNB - BPIRF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BPIRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
CAIB - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMTDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMTDF has been loosely correlated with CAIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMTDF jumps, then CAIB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMTDF
1D Price
Change %
CMTDF100%
N/A
CAIB - CMTDF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FLG - CMTDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.34%
BPIRF - CMTDF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ASCN - CMTDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLHK - CMTDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More