BPIRF
Price
$3.92
Change
+$0.02 (+0.51%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
4.83B
SOBS
Price
$26.50
Change
+$1.48 (+5.92%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
46.62M
Ad is loading...

BPIRF vs SOBS

Header iconBPIRF vs SOBS Comparison
Open Charts BPIRF vs SOBSBanner chart's image
PIRAEUS FINL HLDGS S A
Price$3.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.51%)
Volume$735
Capitalization4.83B
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$26.50
Change+$1.48 (+5.92%)
Volume$470
Capitalization46.62M
BPIRF vs SOBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPIRF vs. SOBS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRF is a Hold and SOBS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BPIRF: $3.92 vs. SOBS: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: BPIRF and SOBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPIRF: 140% vs. SOBS: 45%
Market capitalization -- BPIRF: $4.83B vs. SOBS: $46.62M
BPIRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.83B. SOBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $46.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPIRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOBS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPIRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the long-term than BPIRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPIRF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPIRF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SOBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the short-term than BPIRF.

Price Growth

BPIRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPIRF($4.83B) has a higher market cap than SOBS($46.6M). SOBS has higher P/E ratio than BPIRF: SOBS (9.94) vs BPIRF (6.85). SOBS YTD gains are higher at: 1.884 vs. BPIRF (0.000). BPIRF has higher revenues than SOBS: BPIRF (2.17B) vs SOBS (22.3M).
BPIRFSOBSBPIRF / SOBS
Capitalization4.83B46.6M10,373%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0001.884-
P/E Ratio6.859.9469%
Revenue2.17B22.3M9,740%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.78BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPIRF vs SOBS: Fundamental Ratings
BPIRF
SOBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
950
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5355
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPIRF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (25). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (100). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOBS (50). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (55). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPIRF (85). This means that SOBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPIRFSOBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVRUX16.160.09
+0.56%
UBS US Dividend Ruler P
BRMIX15.360.08
+0.52%
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Index Instl
SGOIX24.780.10
+0.41%
First Eagle Overseas I
LEOIX8.610.01
+0.12%
Lazard Enhanced Opportunities Instl
TGRHX6.55N/A
N/A
Transamerica International Focus A

BPIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPIRF has been loosely correlated with PONT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPIRF jumps, then PONT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPIRF
1D Price
Change %
BPIRF100%
N/A
PONT - BPIRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JTNB - BPIRF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BPIRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIB - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
N/A
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
More