BPIRF
Price
$8.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
10.01B
SOBS
Price
$29.10
Change
+$0.10 (+0.34%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
73.77M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPIRF vs SOBS

Header iconBPIRF vs SOBS Comparison
Open Charts BPIRF vs SOBSBanner chart's image
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A
Price$8.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$212
Capitalization10.01B
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$29.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization73.77M
BPIRF vs SOBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPIRF vs. SOBS commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRF is a Buy and SOBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BPIRF: $8.00 vs. SOBS: $29.10)
Brand notoriety: BPIRF and SOBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPIRF: 108% vs. SOBS: 25%
Market capitalization -- BPIRF: $10.01B vs. SOBS: $73.77M
BPIRF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.01B. SOBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $73.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPIRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSOBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPIRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SOBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPIRF is a better buy in the long-term than SOBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPIRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SOBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPIRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SOBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the short-term than BPIRF.

Price Growth

BPIRF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SOBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPIRF($10B) has a higher market cap than SOBS($73.8M). SOBS has higher P/E ratio than BPIRF: SOBS (16.26) vs BPIRF (8.01). BPIRF YTD gains are higher at: 103.822 vs. SOBS (15.280). BPIRF has higher revenues than SOBS: BPIRF (2.7B) vs SOBS (29.4M).
BPIRFSOBSBPIRF / SOBS
Capitalization10B73.8M13,550%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD103.82215.280679%
P/E Ratio8.0116.2649%
Revenue2.7B29.4M9,197%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.92BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPIRF vs SOBS: Fundamental Ratings
BPIRF
SOBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
1076
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3851
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOBS's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (35). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (100). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOBS (76). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (51). This means that BPIRF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRF (11). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to BPIRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPIRFSOBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
28%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPIRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIMLF0.03N/A
+4.63%
AI / ML Innovations Inc.
TRVR35.000.56
+1.63%
Two Rivers Financial Group, Inc.
SMTGF26.04N/A
N/A
SMA Solar Technology Ag
SSUMY27.68-0.12
-0.43%
Sumitomo Corp.
NFPDF18.93-0.17
-0.89%
Nissin Food Products

BPIRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPIRF has been loosely correlated with PONT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPIRF jumps, then PONT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPIRF
1D Price
Change %
BPIRF100%
N/A
PONT - BPIRF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
JTNB - BPIRF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - BPIRF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.35%
SOBS - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAIB - BPIRF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
N/A
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More