Ad is loading...
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$13.78
Change+$0.11 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets581.98M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.03
Change+$0.11 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Mar 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.4B vs. BPIRX (582M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (2.17) vs NLSCX (0.03). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). BPIRX (54.00) and NLSCX (54.00) have comparable annual turnover. NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. BPIRX (-1.53). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.91 vs. BPIRX (-1.64).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.184 | 1.300 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 582M | 7.4B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 0.03 | 7,098% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.53 | 6.48 | -24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.74 | 8.55 | -161% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.64 | 23.91 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.33 | 32.20 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...