Ad is loading...
BPIRX vs NLSCX
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPIRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch Instl
Price$13.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets511.74M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.33B
BPIRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPIRX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.33B vs. BPIRX (512M). BPIRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPIRX (0.78) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPIRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPIRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPIRX (1.90). BPIRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPIRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPIRX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.07 vs. BPIRX (-2.33). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.16 vs. BPIRX (10.83).
| BPIRX | NLSCX | BPIRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 2.43 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.517 | 1.752 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 512M | 7.33B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.33 | 6.07 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.47 | 13.07 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.83 | 25.16 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.13 | 31.03 | -20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...