BPIRY
Price
$8.62
Change
+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
11.04B
23 days until earnings call
DNSKF
Price
$45.41
Change
+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPIRY vs DNSKF

Header iconBPIRY vs DNSKF Comparison
Open Charts BPIRY vs DNSKFBanner chart's image
Piraeus Financial Holdings S.A
Price$8.62
Change+$0.13 (+1.53%)
Volume$78.53K
Capitalization11.04B
Danske Bank A/S
Price$45.41
Change+$3.73 (+8.95%)
Volume$250
Capitalization34.42B
BPIRY vs DNSKF Comparison Chart in %
BPIRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPIRY vs. DNSKF commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPIRY is a StrongBuy and DNSKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BPIRY: $8.73 vs. DNSKF: $45.41)
Brand notoriety: BPIRY and DNSKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPIRY: 82% vs. DNSKF: 129%
Market capitalization -- BPIRY: $11.04B vs. DNSKF: $34.42B
BPIRY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.04B. DNSKF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $34.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $169.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPIRY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDNSKF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BPIRY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DNSKF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BPIRY and DNSKF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPIRY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DNSKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPIRY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DNSKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPIRY is a better buy in the short-term than DNSKF.

Price Growth

BPIRY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.69% price change this week, while DNSKF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPIRY is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNSKF($34.4B) has a higher market cap than BPIRY($11B). DNSKF has higher P/E ratio than BPIRY: DNSKF (10.38) vs BPIRY (8.67). BPIRY YTD gains are higher at: 133.196 vs. DNSKF (53.102). BPIRY has less debt than DNSKF: BPIRY (4.92B) vs DNSKF (1.12T). DNSKF has higher revenues than BPIRY: DNSKF (56.3B) vs BPIRY (2.7B).
BPIRYDNSKFBPIRY / DNSKF
Capitalization11B34.4B32%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD133.19653.102251%
P/E Ratio8.6710.3884%
Revenue2.7B56.3B5%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.92B1.12T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPIRY vs DNSKF: Fundamental Ratings
BPIRY
DNSKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1036
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
102
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
815
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4455

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPIRY's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DNSKF (95). This means that BPIRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPIRY (100). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew significantly faster than BPIRY’s over the last 12 months.

DNSKF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BPIRY (10). This means that DNSKF’s stock grew similarly to BPIRY’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as DNSKF (42). This means that BPIRY’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

BPIRY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as DNSKF (15). This means that BPIRY’s stock grew similarly to DNSKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPIRYDNSKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPIRY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DNSKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEON3.850.13
+3.49%
Neonode
NICE138.203.05
+2.26%
NICE Ltd
CCIA25.14-0.06
-0.22%
Carlyle Credit Income Fund
BRBS4.22-0.01
-0.24%
Blue Ridge Bankshares
WEN8.98-0.13
-1.43%
Wendy's Company

BPIRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPIRY and HBNC have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPIRY and HBNC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPIRY
1D Price
Change %
BPIRY100%
+1.28%
HBNC - BPIRY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
AX - BPIRY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
CVBF - BPIRY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
EQBK - BPIRY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
MCBS - BPIRY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More

DNSKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DNSKF and FSDK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DNSKF and FSDK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DNSKF
1D Price
Change %
DNSKF100%
N/A
FSDK - DNSKF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOTJ - DNSKF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.76%
BPIRY - DNSKF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
NWPP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTYP - DNSKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More