Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLEX vs NLSCX
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$9.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.52M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.07
Change-$0.07 (-0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.32B
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.32B vs. BPLEX (70.5M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLEX (0.47) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLEX (27 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). BPLEX (2.97) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLEX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.23 vs. BPLEX (-11.52). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.26 vs. BPLEX (-24.45).
| BPLEX | NLSCX | BPLEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.43 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.918 | 2.148 | 229% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.5M | 7.32B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.52 | 6.23 | -185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.74 | 13.22 | -187% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.45 | 24.26 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | -46.14 | 32.47 | -142% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement