Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLEX vs NLSCX
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$10.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets80.97M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.54B
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.54B vs. BPLEX (81M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLEX (0.42) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLEX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLEX (2.97) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLEX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.83 vs. BPLEX (-5.99). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.83 vs. BPLEX (-18.45).
| BPLEX | NLSCX | BPLEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.43 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.344 | 5.936 | 326% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81M | 7.54B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.99 | 8.83 | -68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.05 | 16.55 | -61% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.45 | 18.83 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | -36.58 | 43.23 | -85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers