Ad is loading...
BPLEX vs NLSCX
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLEX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity I
Price$9.32
Change+$0.09 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
BPLEX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLEX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLEX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. BPLEX (67.7M). BPLEX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLEX (0.47) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLEX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLEX (26 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). BPLEX (2.97) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLEX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLEX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLEX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. BPLEX (-14.14). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. BPLEX (-26.11).
| BPLEX | NLSCX | BPLEX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 2.43 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.43 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.874 | -0.735 | -119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.14 | 4.28 | -331% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.70 | 7.87 | -352% |
| Returns for 5 years | -26.11 | 23.56 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.41 | 27.43 | -173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers