Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSAX
BPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSAX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.8M
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.64
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.75B
BPLSX vs NLSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSAX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.75B vs. BPLSX (81.8M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSAX: BPLSX (0.49) vs NLSAX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSAX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSAX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSAX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. BPLSX (0.96). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.11 vs. BPLSX (-0.28).
| BPLSX | NLSAX | BPLSX / NLSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 1.68 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 1.68 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.078 | 6.013 | 351% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.8M | 7.75B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | 8.30 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.83 | 20.11 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.28 | 23.11 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.37 | 54.97 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement