Ad is loading...
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$12.48
Change+$0.12 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.74M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.72
Change+$0.16 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.13B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.13B vs. BPLSX (67.7M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.55) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (26 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.28 vs. BPLSX (-8.89). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. BPLSX (-10.97).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.980 | -0.735 | -133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.7M | 7.13B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.89 | 4.28 | -208% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.59 | 7.87 | -224% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.97 | 23.56 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.23 | 27.43 | -125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers