Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.54
Change+$0.10 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.27M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.51B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. BPLSX (81.3M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.49) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.00 vs. BPLSX (-2.36). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.14 vs. BPLSX (-3.03).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.974 | 5.314 | 338% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 81.3M | 7.51B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.36 | 8.00 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.47 | 15.93 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.03 | 18.14 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.61 | 43.68 | -49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement