Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$13.44
Change+$0.25 (+1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.24M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.29
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. BPLSX (72.2M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.54) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.23 vs. BPLSX (-3.55). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.24 vs. BPLSX (-17.39).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.761 | 3.109 | 250% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 7.39B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.55 | 7.23 | -49% |
| Returns for 3 years | -14.56 | 11.91 | -122% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.39 | 22.24 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -29.70 | 33.82 | -88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement