Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPLSX vs NLSCX
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPLSX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Instl
Price$14.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.46M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.57
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.58B
BPLSX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPLSX vs. NLSCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPLSX is a Hold and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.58B vs. BPLSX (78.5M). BPLSX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPLSX (0.51) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPLSX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPLSX (27 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). BPLSX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BPLSX (35.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPLSX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPLSX (100000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. BPLSX (0.69). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.64 vs. BPLSX (-6.28).
| BPLSX | NLSCX | BPLSX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 2.43 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.542 | 5.144 | 283% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1000 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 78.5M | 7.58B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.69 | 10.52 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.57 | 13.21 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.28 | 21.64 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.04 | 37.87 | -66% |