BPOSF vs CSCMY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPOSF is a Hold and CSCMY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPOSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSCMY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BPOSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSCMY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BPOSF (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CSCMY (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +5.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.85%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Air Freight/Couriers (+1.80% weekly)The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| BPOSF | CSCMY | BPOSF / CSCMY | |
| Capitalization | 966M | 254M | 380% |
| EBITDA | 599M | 89.4M | 670% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 20.165 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 4.76 | 13.97 | 34% |
| Revenue | 4.39B | 196M | 2,239% |
| Total Cash | 1.19B | 116M | 1,025% |
| Total Debt | 1.49B | 333M | 448% |
BPOSF | CSCMY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BPOSF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSCMY (92). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew significantly faster than CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.
BPOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CSCMY (100). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew similarly to CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.
BPOSF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CSCMY (87). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew similarly to CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.
CSCMY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BPOSF (70). This means that CSCMY’s stock grew similarly to BPOSF’s over the last 12 months.
BPOSF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSCMY (74). This means that BPOSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSCMY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BPOSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BPOSF and BPOSY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPOSF and BPOSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPOSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPOSF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BPOSY - BPOSF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ATXG - BPOSF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| RLGT - BPOSF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.83% | ||
| CYRX - BPOSF | 5% Poorly correlated | -5.28% | ||
| CGJTF - BPOSF | 4% Poorly correlated | -5.70% | ||
More | ||||
CSCMY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CSCMY and BPOSY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSCMY and BPOSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSCMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSCMY | 100% | +5.00% | ||
| BPOSY - CSCMY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CYRX - CSCMY | 3% Poorly correlated | -5.28% | ||
| FWRD - CSCMY | 2% Poorly correlated | -4.30% | ||
| CGJTF - CSCMY | -4% Poorly correlated | -5.70% | ||
| BPOSF - CSCMY | -4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||