BPOSY
Price
$1.87
Change
-$0.17 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
966.06M
SNOTF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.05 (-10.42%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
Ad is loading...

BPOSY vs SNOTF

Header iconBPOSY vs SNOTF Comparison
Open Charts BPOSY vs SNOTFBanner chart's image
Bpost SA
Price$1.87
Change-$0.17 (-8.33%)
Volume$177
Capitalization966.06M
Sinotrans
Price$0.43
Change-$0.05 (-10.42%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization1.72B
BPOSY vs SNOTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPOSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPOSY vs. SNOTF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPOSY is a Hold and SNOTF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BPOSY: $1.87 vs. SNOTF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: BPOSY and SNOTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPOSY: 62% vs. SNOTF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BPOSY: $966.06M vs. SNOTF: $1.72B
BPOSY [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $966.06M. SNOTF’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $126.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $13.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPOSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNOTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPOSY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNOTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNOTF is a better buy in the long-term than BPOSY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPOSY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BPOSY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BPOSY (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а -8.33% price change this week, while SNOTF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was +2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (+2.32% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNOTF($1.72B) has a higher market cap than BPOSY($966M). BPOSY has higher P/E ratio than SNOTF: BPOSY (3.97) vs SNOTF (3.13). SNOTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BPOSY (-4.956). SNOTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.61B vs. BPOSY (599M). SNOTF has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. BPOSY (1.19B). BPOSY has less debt than SNOTF: BPOSY (1.49B) vs SNOTF (15.3B). SNOTF has higher revenues than BPOSY: SNOTF (118B) vs BPOSY (4.39B).
BPOSYSNOTFBPOSY / SNOTF
Capitalization966M1.72B56%
EBITDA599M7.61B8%
Gain YTD-4.9560.000-
P/E Ratio3.973.13127%
Revenue4.39B118B4%
Total Cash1.19B13.7B9%
Total Debt1.49B15.3B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPOSY vs SNOTF: Fundamental Ratings
BPOSY
SNOTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10028
SMR RATING
1..100
7766
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9661
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNOTF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as BPOSY (29). This means that SNOTF’s stock grew similarly to BPOSY’s over the last 12 months.

SNOTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BPOSY (100). This means that SNOTF’s stock grew significantly faster than BPOSY’s over the last 12 months.

SNOTF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as BPOSY (77). This means that SNOTF’s stock grew similarly to BPOSY’s over the last 12 months.

SNOTF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BPOSY (89). This means that SNOTF’s stock grew similarly to BPOSY’s over the last 12 months.

SNOTF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BPOSY (96). This means that SNOTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BPOSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPOSYSNOTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
48%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPOSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPCIX24.440.27
+1.12%
Timothy Plan Israel Common Values C
MFWJX16.460.05
+0.30%
MFS Global Total Return R4
CCALX81.900.20
+0.24%
Conestoga Small Cap Institutional
JMNCX12.800.03
+0.23%
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral C
TISWX49.19N/A
N/A
Nuveen S&P 500 Index W

BPOSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPOSY and SNOTF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPOSY and SNOTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPOSY
1D Price
Change %
BPOSY100%
N/A
SNOTF - BPOSY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPOSF - BPOSY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSCMY - BPOSY
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.25%
ZTO - BPOSY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
CGJTF - BPOSY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
More

SNOTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNOTF and BPOSY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNOTF and BPOSY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNOTF
1D Price
Change %
SNOTF100%
N/A
BPOSY - SNOTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ROYMY - SNOTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPSTF - SNOTF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPSTY - SNOTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JDLGF - SNOTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More