BPPPF
Price
$25.20
Change
+$0.09 (+0.36%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
8.35B
BZLFY
Price
$16.21
Change
-$0.15 (-0.92%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
10.57B
54 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPPPF vs BZLFY

Header iconBPPPF vs BZLFY Comparison
Open Charts BPPPF vs BZLFYBanner chart's image
Bid
Price$25.20
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.35B
Bunzl
Price$16.21
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
Volume$66.73K
Capitalization10.57B
BPPPF vs BZLFY Comparison Chart in %
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPPPF vs. BZLFY commentary
Oct 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPPPF is a Buy and BZLFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BPPPF: $25.19 vs. BZLFY: $16.21)
Brand notoriety: BPPPF and BZLFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPPPF: 156% vs. BZLFY: 126%
Market capitalization -- BPPPF: $8.35B vs. BZLFY: $10.57B
BPPPF [@Food Distributors] is valued at $8.35B. BZLFY’s [@Food Distributors] market capitalization is $10.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Distributors] industry ranges from $37.34B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Distributors] industry is $4.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPPPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBZLFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPPPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BZLFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPPPF is a better buy in the long-term than BZLFY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPPPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BZLFY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPPPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BZLFY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BZLFY is a better buy in the short-term than BPPPF.

Price Growth

BPPPF (@Food Distributors) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BZLFY (@Food Distributors) price change was +0.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

BZLFY is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Distributors (-2.54% weekly)

Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BZLFY($10.6B) has a higher market cap than BPPPF($8.35B). BPPPF has higher P/E ratio than BZLFY: BPPPF (17.90) vs BZLFY (16.62). BPPPF YTD gains are higher at: 7.541 vs. BZLFY (-20.232). BPPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16.2B vs. BZLFY (1.23B). BPPPF has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. BZLFY (481M). BZLFY has less debt than BPPPF: BZLFY (2.73B) vs BPPPF (26.2B). BPPPF has higher revenues than BZLFY: BPPPF (236B) vs BZLFY (11.8B).
BPPPFBZLFYBPPPF / BZLFY
Capitalization8.35B10.6B79%
EBITDA16.2B1.23B1,313%
Gain YTD7.541-20.232-37%
P/E Ratio17.9016.62108%
Revenue236B11.8B2,000%
Total Cash11.8B481M2,453%
Total Debt26.2B2.73B960%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPPPF vs BZLFY: Fundamental Ratings
BPPPF
BZLFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3853
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3864
SMR RATING
1..100
9979
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4586
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BPPPF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (33). This means that BPPPF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

BPPPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (64). This means that BPPPF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

BZLFY's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BPPPF (99). This means that BZLFY’s stock grew similarly to BPPPF’s over the last 12 months.

BPPPF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as BZLFY (63). This means that BPPPF’s stock grew similarly to BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

BPPPF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BZLFY (86). This means that BPPPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BZLFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPPPFBZLFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPPPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BZLFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPSB22.77N/A
N/A
Harbor Smid Cap Core ETF
PGZ10.39-0.01
-0.12%
PRINCIPAL REAL ESTATE Income FUND
USPX58.96-0.19
-0.32%
Franklin US Equity Index ETF
VSLU42.97-0.17
-0.39%
Applied Finance Valuation LgCp ETF
GBLD18.00-0.21
-1.13%
Invesco MSCI Green Building ETF

BPPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BPPPF and MSHXF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BPPPF and MSHXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPPPF
1D Price
Change %
BPPPF100%
N/A
MSHXF - BPPPF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HFFG - BPPPF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
COLFF - BPPPF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZLFY - BPPPF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
IVFH - BPPPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
More

BZLFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BZLFY and PFGC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZLFY and PFGC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BZLFY
1D Price
Change %
BZLFY100%
-0.92%
PFGC - BZLFY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
SYY - BZLFY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
HFFG - BZLFY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.66%
SPTN - BZLFY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USFD - BZLFY
18%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More