Ad is loading...
BPRN
Price
$37.46
Change
-$0.64 (-1.68%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CFSB
Price
$6.78
Change
+$0.01 (+0.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BPRN vs CFSB

Header iconBPRN vs CFSB Comparison
Open Charts BPRN vs CFSBBanner chart's image
Princeton Ban
Price$37.46
Change-$0.64 (-1.68%)
Volume$6.97K
CapitalizationN/A
CFSB Ban
Price$6.78
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
Volume$2.62K
CapitalizationN/A
BPRN vs CFSB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BPRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPRN vs. CFSB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRN is a StrongSell and CFSB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BPRN: $37.46 vs. CFSB: $6.78)
Brand notoriety: BPRN and CFSB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPRN: 88% vs. CFSB: 63%
Market capitalization -- BPRN: $195.06M vs. CFSB: $47.76M
BPRN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $195.06M. CFSB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $47.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPRN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFSB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BPRN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFSB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BPRN is a better buy in the long-term than CFSB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPRN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BPRN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BPRN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.70% price change this week, while CFSB (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BPRN is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.

CFSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPRN($195M) has a higher market cap than CFSB($47.8M). CFSB has higher P/E ratio than BPRN: CFSB (127.33) vs BPRN (7.53). BPRN YTD gains are higher at: 8.195 vs. CFSB (5.092). CFSB has less debt than BPRN: CFSB (20M) vs BPRN (24.3M). BPRN has higher revenues than CFSB: BPRN (72.4M) vs CFSB (8.14M).
BPRNCFSBBPRN / CFSB
Capitalization195M47.8M408%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.1955.092161%
P/E Ratio7.53127.336%
Revenue72.4M8.14M890%
Total Cash14.8MN/A-
Total Debt24.3M20M122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BPRN: Fundamental Ratings
BPRN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPRN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BPRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEMLX11.97-0.04
-0.33%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn C
FIDLX54.80-0.50
-0.90%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Z
KCSIX14.82-0.17
-1.13%
Knights of Columbus Small Cap I
LGOSX25.50-0.31
-1.20%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities R4
VSRAX25.31-0.44
-1.71%
Invesco Small Cap Value R

BPRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPRN has been closely correlated with HBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BPRN jumps, then HBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPRN
1D Price
Change %
BPRN100%
-1.68%
HBT - BPRN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.62%
BY - BPRN
67%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
TRST - BPRN
66%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
CNOB - BPRN
66%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
FISI - BPRN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More

CFSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFSB has been loosely correlated with BPRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFSB jumps, then BPRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFSB
1D Price
Change %
CFSB100%
+0.15%
BPRN - CFSB
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
ZION - CFSB
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
SBT - CFSB
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FVCB - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
INBK - CFSB
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More