Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPRRX vs NLSCX
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$14.58
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets556.83M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.72
Change+$0.03 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.84B vs. BPRRX (557M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPRRX (0.60) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPRRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPRRX (2.15). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.29 vs. BPRRX (0.66). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.11 vs. BPRRX (16.18).
| BPRRX | NLSCX | BPRRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.645 | 5.653 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 557M | 7.84B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.66 | 7.29 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.90 | 20.58 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.18 | 17.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.76 | 43.44 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement