Ad is loading...
BPRRX vs NLSCX
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$12.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets502.59M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.07B
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.07B vs. BPRRX (503M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPRRX (0.66) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPRRX (14 years) vs NLSCX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPRRX (2.15). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.64 vs. BPRRX (-4.75). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.03 vs. BPRRX (0.92).
| BPRRX | NLSCX | BPRRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.552 | -1.752 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 503M | 7.07B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.75 | 3.64 | -131% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.74 | 5.53 | -321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.92 | 22.03 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.80 | 26.52 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...