Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPRRX vs NLSCX
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts BPRRX vs NLSCX
Boston Partners Long/Short Rsrch I
Price$13.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets527.69M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.47B
BPRRX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPRRX vs. NLSCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPRRX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.47B vs. BPRRX (528M). BPRRX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: BPRRX (0.63) vs NLSCX (0.00). BPRRX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: BPRRX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than BPRRX (2.15). BPRRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BPRRX: NLSCX (1000) vs BPRRX (2500). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. BPRRX (-2.06). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 20.81 vs. BPRRX (11.07).
| BPRRX | NLSCX | BPRRX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.43 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.439 | 3.674 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 528M | 7.47B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.06 | 7.76 | -27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.14 | 15.20 | -40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.07 | 20.81 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.52 | 35.30 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement