Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BPSCX vs SSGSX
BPSCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts BPSCX vs SSGSX
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
Price$25.39
Change+$0.67 (+2.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets599.95M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.54
Change+$1.48 (+3.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.34B
BPSCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BPSCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPSCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.34B vs. BPSCX (600M). BPSCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: BPSCX (0.56) vs SSGSX (0.50). BPSCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: BPSCX (27 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). BPSCX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . BPSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). BPSCX (2500) and SSGSX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. BPSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.21 vs. SSGSX (-5.63). BPSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.64 vs. SSGSX (12.40).
| BPSCX | SSGSX | BPSCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.26 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.980 | -5.104 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 600M | 5.34B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.21 | -5.63 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.09 | -11.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.64 | 12.40 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.81 | 11.63 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement