BPT vs CSAN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPT is a Hold and CSAN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BPT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCSAN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BPT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CSAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BPT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSAN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BPT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CSAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BPT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -7.18% price change this week, while CSAN (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -4.97% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.69%.
Reported Earning Dates
BPT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
CSAN is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.61% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
@Oil Refining/Marketing (-0.36% weekly)The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| BPT | CSAN | BPT / CSAN | |
| Capitalization | 52M | 6.02B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 5.31M | 13.6B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -4.449 | -12.132 | 37% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.55 | 24.94 | 38% |
| Revenue | 6.64M | 40.6B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 5.3M | 19.7B | 0% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 62.3B | - |
BPT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BPT | CSAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DINT | 21.39 | 0.55 | +2.64% |
| Davis Select International ETF | |||
| PUI | 39.51 | 0.59 | +1.52% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Utilities Momt ETF | |||
| GMUN | 48.46 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Access Municipal Bd ETF | |||
| IBDR | 24.06 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corp ETF | |||
| TOTR | 39.59 | -0.21 | -0.52% |
| T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF | |||
BPT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPT has been loosely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPT jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BPT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPT | 100% | -5.49% | ||
| MPC - BPT | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| PSX - BPT | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| PARR - BPT | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VLO - BPT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| DINO - BPT | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.20% | ||
More | ||||
CSAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSAN has been closely correlated with UGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSAN jumps, then UGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSAN | 100% | +2.14% | ||
| UGP - CSAN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| DK - CSAN | 33% Poorly correlated | +3.31% | ||
| CTXAY - CSAN | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.64% | ||
| DKL - CSAN | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| DINO - CSAN | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.20% | ||
More | ||||