BPYPM
Price
$16.44
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
OWL
Price
$20.48
Change
+$0.74 (+3.75%)
Updated
Aug 12, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.86B
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BPYPM vs OWL

Header iconBPYPM vs OWL Comparison
Open Charts BPYPM vs OWLBanner chart's image
Brookfield Property Partners
Price$16.44
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Owl Capital
Price$20.48
Change+$0.74 (+3.75%)
Volume$61.3K
Capitalization12.86B
BPYPM vs OWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BPYPM vs. OWL commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BPYPM is a Buy and OWL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BPYPM: $16.44 vs. OWL: $19.75)
Brand notoriety: BPYPM and OWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BPYPM: 47% vs. OWL: 80%
Market capitalization -- BPYPM: $0 vs. OWL: $12.86B
BPYPM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $0. OWL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $12.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $174.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BPYPM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BPYPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OWL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OWL is a better buy in the long-term than BPYPM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BPYPM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BPYPM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BPYPM is a better buy in the short-term than OWL.

Price Growth

BPYPM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.51% price change this week, while OWL (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

OWL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+3.94% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BPYPM YTD gains are higher at: 12.265 vs. OWL (-13.478).
BPYPMOWLBPYPM / OWL
CapitalizationN/A12.9B-
EBITDAN/A804M-
Gain YTD12.265-13.478-91%
P/E RatioN/A179.55-
RevenueN/A2.62B-
Total CashN/A118M-
Total DebtN/A3.65B-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BPYPMOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BPYPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCTAX49.11N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq A
KNPAX112.88N/A
N/A
Kinetics Paradigm Adv A
GSVUX17.31N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value R6
RIBEX63.92-0.06
-0.09%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R2E
RTIYX12.02-0.04
-0.33%
Russell Inv Multifactor Intl Eq Y

BPYPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BPYPM has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BPYPM jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BPYPM
1D Price
Change %
BPYPM100%
-0.00%
TROW - BPYPM
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
PNNT - BPYPM
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
GSBD - BPYPM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
BEN - BPYPM
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
CG - BPYPM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More